The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination

Moderator: JaggedAppliance

The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination

Postby AFGHAN PSYCHO » 14 Sep 2016, 03:48

Seriously, are you guys even thinking properly? If you are going to give such a massive buff to UEF then why in the world simply make Aeon and especially Seraphim weaker? Seraphim already lack RAS SACUs and now you want to nurf their RAS and also FORCE people to go Aeon in order to play air? Whoever are coming up with these needs to take a step back and re-evaluate what they are doing. In an effort to decrease one faction's dominance over the others (Cybran) you guys are pretty much proposing to have another take its place (UEF) and leave Seraphim in the Gutter. The Notha/ Ythotha buff will be no where near enough to balance out the massive setbacks.
AFGHAN PSYCHO
 
Posts: 4
Joined: 14 Sep 2016, 03:39
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
FAF User Name: AFGHANPSYCHO

Re: The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination

Postby angus000 » 14 Sep 2016, 05:32

Sorry Afghan, can you tell me how was Sera nerfed? Ras has been nerfed for all factions, they are all in the same situation airwise.

These are the patch notes http://content.faforever.com/patchnotes/3660.htm
angus000
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 205
Joined: 02 Feb 2015, 21:51
Has liked: 111 times
Been liked: 39 times
FAF User Name: flexible

Re: The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination

Postby biass » 14 Sep 2016, 07:49

Please have a serious reexamination of the patch notes, please ^.^
Map thread: https://bit.ly/2PBsa5H

Petricpwnz wrote:biass on his campaign to cleanse and remake every single map of FAF because he is an untolerating reincarnation of mapping hitler
User avatar
biass
Contributor
 
Posts: 2239
Joined: 03 Dec 2015, 07:54
Has liked: 598 times
Been liked: 662 times
FAF User Name: biass

Re: The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination

Postby Vanguard » 14 Sep 2016, 10:57

AFGHAN PSYCHO wrote:Seraphim already lack RAS SACUs and now you want to nurf their RAS and also FORCE people to go Aeon in order to play air?

Not sure about what makes you think that people are forced to go AEON for air in the newest patch. Isn´t that already pretty much the case now? Every seton game has 2 Aeons for Air, every gap has 2 Aeons for Air. T3 Torp bombers and Air Gunships are pretty much all the arguments needed, aside the strong Aeon ASF. I need a better explanation on this point.
Vanguard
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 88
Joined: 05 Apr 2016, 13:45
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 11 times
FAF User Name: Vanguard

Re: The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination

Postby AFGHAN PSYCHO » 14 Sep 2016, 17:23

biass wrote:Please have a serious reexamination of the patch notes, please ^.^


I did, it reeks of autism and heavily buffing UEF while further strengthening Aeon's position as dominant air.
AFGHAN PSYCHO
 
Posts: 4
Joined: 14 Sep 2016, 03:39
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
FAF User Name: AFGHANPSYCHO

Re: The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination

Postby biass » 14 Sep 2016, 17:39

AFGHAN PSYCHO wrote:
biass wrote:Please have a serious reexamination of the patch notes, please ^.^


I did, it reeks of autism and heavily buffing UEF while further strengthening Aeon's position as dominant air.


nice dude

also, if all factions get the same nerf to ras, how does aeon become stronger?
Map thread: https://bit.ly/2PBsa5H

Petricpwnz wrote:biass on his campaign to cleanse and remake every single map of FAF because he is an untolerating reincarnation of mapping hitler
User avatar
biass
Contributor
 
Posts: 2239
Joined: 03 Dec 2015, 07:54
Has liked: 598 times
Been liked: 662 times
FAF User Name: biass

Re: The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination

Postby NapSpan » 16 Sep 2016, 01:04

He is enlightened by the power of delirium.
We have "Continentals" so moving shit around must be important.
User avatar
NapSpan
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 244
Joined: 27 Apr 2015, 16:25
Has liked: 28 times
Been liked: 61 times
FAF User Name: NapSpan


Return to Balance Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest