Galactic War 2.0

Re: Galactic War 2.0

Postby Iszh » 05 Nov 2015, 16:28

I ve heard the same there is a memory leak. Once i read wtf this is and forget about it again. I asked sheeo and he told there to much work to do about it. Here is the code of gw server:
https://github.com/FAForever/server/tre ... r/gwserver
There you can also find the client gw and so on. If somebody is able to work with this he is welcome to do something i cant, my student times are over for a long time now :D
User avatar
Iszh
Evaluator
 
Posts: 827
Joined: 26 Apr 2012, 08:51
Has liked: 116 times
Been liked: 126 times
FAF User Name: Iszh

Re: Galactic War 2.0

Postby IceDreamer » 08 Nov 2015, 18:10

We're waiting on the server update. It's pointless beginning prior when the entire structure is about to shift.
IceDreamer
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 2607
Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 07:01
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 488 times

Re: Galactic War 2.0

Postby WinterShade » 13 Nov 2015, 04:40

IceDreamer wrote:We're waiting on the server update. It's pointless beginning prior when the entire structure is about to shift.


I assume you mean an update for the FAF server? and if so (or not) is that expected to happen?
rkrempel- "Still not over the fact that T2 bombers can TK..."
User avatar
WinterShade
Crusader
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 18 Sep 2013, 03:02
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
FAF User Name: WinterShade

Re: Galactic War 2.0

Postby speed2 » 13 Nov 2015, 06:18

It is expected to happen, no ETA
User avatar
speed2
Contributor
 
Posts: 3189
Joined: 05 Jan 2013, 15:11
Has liked: 636 times
Been liked: 1119 times
FAF User Name: speed2


Re: Galactic War 2.0

Postby briang » 25 Dec 2015, 23:46

50% sounds far too high.
Ninrai 2015- briang is usually an aggressive d****e
briang
Spammer
 
Posts: 576
Joined: 17 Nov 2015, 17:52
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 65 times
FAF User Name: YouLikeThat

Re: Galactic War 2.0

Postby FunkOff » 08 Jan 2016, 22:22



This whole document is terrible. It literally removes EVERYTHING about GW that was ever good or interesting.
FunkOff
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 1863
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 17:27
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 43 times
FAF User Name: FakeOff

Re: Galactic War 2.0

Postby Sir Prize » 09 Jan 2016, 03:00

briang wrote:50% sounds far too high.

Anything less than 50% and w[e] would just win too quickly :D

In all seriousness, I think once the server changes are live this HAS to be a priority. There's demand for GW of pretty any description. Even if it's nothing more than a matchmaker with a finite number of maps/planets and no reinforcements, recalls or particularly meaningful death to start with and gets iterated on, it will be good. And used.
User avatar
Sir Prize
Evaluator
 
Posts: 573
Joined: 24 May 2014, 10:29
Has liked: 77 times
Been liked: 91 times
FAF User Name: Sir-Prize

Re: Galactic War 2.0

Postby Blodir » 09 Jan 2016, 03:49

FunkOff wrote:


This whole document is terrible. It literally removes EVERYTHING about GW that was ever good or interesting.

It is not forbidden of you to be a bit more constructive. Maybe its a good idea to do so when you are talking about a controversial topic so that you don't sound like an idiot
User avatar
Blodir
Contributor
 
Posts: 1175
Joined: 07 Jan 2013, 14:14
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 535 times
FAF User Name: Snowbound

Re: Galactic War 2.0

Postby briang » 09 Jan 2016, 04:08

I think you exaggerate the demand for this. I'll leave it to the devs to decide what is worth their time.
Ninrai 2015- briang is usually an aggressive d****e
briang
Spammer
 
Posts: 576
Joined: 17 Nov 2015, 17:52
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 65 times
FAF User Name: YouLikeThat

PreviousNext

Return to Galactic War

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests