Elusive wrote:The problem as I see it is that the Solace doesnt have a properly defined neiche within its role as an air to navy unit.
T2 torps are pretty clear in function, they are a spammable unit that you can throw at naval AA until they dont have any more, at which point you can run amock.
Are t3 torps supposed to be the same, but just an upgraded version? or are they meant to have a different role, such as being the naval equivilent of a strat bomber that focus single high prirotry targets? If they are simple just an upgrade, in what way? better mass to damage ratio, extra tanky, faster?
If we check the damage/mass per pass, we get:
2.42 for the Solace. 2.77 for the T2 torpedo bomber. So the T2 torpedo bomber has a 14.5% better ratio.
1.55 for the Sera Strat. 2.98 for the Notha. So the Notha has a 92% better ratio.
With the Corsair vs Cybran strat you'll probably get a similar picture. So if you're going to base the Solace on how it works compared to T2 torp bombers, by looking at how T3 strats compare to lower tier bombers, then the Solace comes out of this better.
My take on the Solace is that it is supposed to be a tankier version of the t2 version that is made to fly through heavy AA and strike high value targets on the other side like submerged ACUs.
This puts them as a snipe tool. In this way they'd also already perform as intended. The only problem is that they're visible on radar.
As I said in the first post, the problems with the firing pattern have to be fixed, and it remains to be seen if anything needs to be done about the Solace at all. When I looked at the numbers, they're far better than people think. But they're not being used often enough so no one really notices.