QuestionMarkNoob wrote:This thread is not about making Aeon great at everything, it is supposed give a unit, which makes literally 50-95% of a navy force, and is built from min 5 until you won/lost your side, some attention.
The frigate is probably the most important naval unit, when one faction has a crushing weakness in that aspect, while the others are totally fine, we have got ourselves a problem.
I know this should come last, but I'll admit something here.
It's not a crushing weakness. This is the pointless hyperbole that turns people off.
Buffing the Aeon frig makes it top tier, which clearly it shouldn't be.
But, I actually had another look at the entire thread and agree the frig costs too much, reducing costs to 270M, 2.700E, would be good, build time 1.2 too, would less even than Cybran, but allows extra time to build shards.
So I actually now agree with you, the rest of the garbage is here:
QuestionMarkNoob wrote:The aeon destroyer can have the most insane stats ever, if 90% of the shots get dodged those stats don't matter. Also, like every other destroyer, it loses to the Sera destroyer by a mile.
This is simply not true. UEF destro is objectively the strongest.
Aeon destros don't get dodged 90% of the time, even in 1 on 1 micro-ed engagements, let alone in actual engagements.
I also don't understand the pointless hyperbole here.
The Aeon frig does okay against opposing frigs.
It loses to Cybran, ties against UEF and wins against Sera frigs.
Yes, it lacks AA, but let's not pretend that frigate AA is good. Frigs lose mass for mass even to Jesters.
Besides, as you said, frigs are supposed to be cannon fodder in later stages, not for air support.
QuestionMarkNoob wrote:The submerged Sera destroyer isn't strong, so I don't get what you want to accomplish with this statement.
Yes, the Aeon cruiser is the best against air units with his high HP and very strong DPS. Sadly, it is almost useless in the other categories, especially the anti-navy weapon is a complete joke. The T2 flak and shields however are nice.
As already stated, multiple times, the Solace is not cost efficient, and most of its torps can be outpaced quite easily. Additionally, you need a T3 air HQ to build it, which almost nobody does, other than the air player. On small navy maps, the game is regularly pretty much over, before anyone even reaches the T3 air stage. So, if it were any good it would be more of a positive for Aeon air than Aeon navy. It’s not good however.
In the current balance the Tempest is still not all that efficient and certainly not a reason to choose Aeon navy over any other navy. Luckily that might change after the patch.
The point here is that Aeon have a navy that lack any specific weakness. Seraphim has a sub weakness, UEF destros are strong but are the only to lose against submerged Sera destros, by a large margin, and UEF lacks t3 AA, and Cybran has no cost effective TML bombardment options, or naval shielding. All other factions lack even a remotely decent naval Exp.
It isn't just the cruiser that provides powerful AA either, Shards are actually pretty great, and their 800 Health just trolls torpedo bombers which deal 750 damage.
QuestionMarkNoob wrote:Auroras get absolutely murdered by frigs, are super slow and die to one t1 bomber. They can be good for delaying a probable navy loss, against a competent player however, the aurora will make little difference in almost any other situation.
My point is, every factions has weakness and strengths. Aurora get murdered by frigs, yes, the hover has other purposes.