Balance patch 3696 Feedback Thread

Moderator: JaggedAppliance

Re: Balance patch 3696 Feedback Thread

Postby TheKoopa » 16 May 2018, 20:28

I also agree that asswasher should be 1 shot by t1 maa
Feather: I am usually pretty good in judging people's abilities, intelligence and motives

Evildrew: Just because I didnt choose you for my team last year doesnt give you the right to be all bitchy and negative about my proposal
User avatar
TheKoopa
Contributor
 
Posts: 1158
Joined: 04 Sep 2013, 18:04
Location: New York
Has liked: 172 times
Been liked: 225 times
FAF User Name: Gently-

Re: Balance patch 3696 Feedback Thread

Postby duel gap player » 16 May 2018, 20:30

Bullydozer wrote:totally with duel gap player on this. in fact, 1 t1 maa shot should one shot strat bombers.


you not read what I wrote correctly

t1 maa kill t1 bomber
sam kill strat
t4 aa kill asswasher but there is none
duel gap player
Crusader
 
Posts: 31
Joined: 16 May 2018, 16:07
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Balance patch 3696 Feedback Thread

Postby TheKoopa » 16 May 2018, 20:32

Well first of all besides the fact that 1 sam doesn't 1 shot 1 strat bomber, this maa buff got rid of an interesting aspect of play and removed possible strategies, dumbing the game down. We should be doing the opposite
Feather: I am usually pretty good in judging people's abilities, intelligence and motives

Evildrew: Just because I didnt choose you for my team last year doesnt give you the right to be all bitchy and negative about my proposal
User avatar
TheKoopa
Contributor
 
Posts: 1158
Joined: 04 Sep 2013, 18:04
Location: New York
Has liked: 172 times
Been liked: 225 times
FAF User Name: Gently-

Re: Balance patch 3696 Feedback Thread

Postby duel gap player » 16 May 2018, 20:35

TheKoopa wrote:Well first of all besides the fact that 1 sam doesn't 1 shot 1 strat bomber, this maa buff got rid of an interesting aspect of play and removed possible strategies, dumbing the game down. We should be doing the opposite


aa should kill bomber and should avoid it. In 1v1 its so complete pointless just to bash noob and win instantly with 1 bomber and can't kill with land at all
duel gap player
Crusader
 
Posts: 31
Joined: 16 May 2018, 16:07
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Balance patch 3696 Feedback Thread

Postby Blodir » 16 May 2018, 21:34

duel gap player wrote:I don't like the anti air change because it will bring it back to the days when bombers had no counters from ground.

Anti-air should be able to kill a bomber in one pass otherwise it is broken. A sam can kill a startegic bomber in one pass as well and I hear no one complaining about it. People just want their 'I-win' button back.

Sam is op af. It completely disables air game after a certain point on majority of maps
User avatar
Blodir
Contributor
 
Posts: 1175
Joined: 07 Jan 2013, 14:14
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 535 times
FAF User Name: Snowbound

Re: Balance patch 3696 Feedback Thread

Postby IceDreamer » 16 May 2018, 21:54

Blodir wrote:
duel gap player wrote:I don't like the anti air change because it will bring it back to the days when bombers had no counters from ground.

Anti-air should be able to kill a bomber in one pass otherwise it is broken. A sam can kill a startegic bomber in one pass as well and I hear no one complaining about it. People just want their 'I-win' button back.

Sam is op af. It completely disables air game after a certain point on majority of maps


Were that true we would not see 400+ ASF spam on every long-game map. We do. QED: SAMs don't shut down Air as claimed.
IceDreamer
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 2607
Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 07:01
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 488 times

Re: Balance patch 3696 Feedback Thread

Postby Blodir » 16 May 2018, 22:05

IceDreamer wrote:
Blodir wrote:
duel gap player wrote:I don't like the anti air change because it will bring it back to the days when bombers had no counters from ground.

Anti-air should be able to kill a bomber in one pass otherwise it is broken. A sam can kill a startegic bomber in one pass as well and I hear no one complaining about it. People just want their 'I-win' button back.

Sam is op af. It completely disables air game after a certain point on majority of maps


Were that true we would not see 400+ ASF spam on every long-game map. We do. QED: SAMs don't shut down Air as claimed.

I will reveal to you an obscure secret: most players are absolute garbage.
User avatar
Blodir
Contributor
 
Posts: 1175
Joined: 07 Jan 2013, 14:14
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 535 times
FAF User Name: Snowbound

Re: Balance patch 3696 Feedback Thread

Postby duel gap player » 16 May 2018, 22:23

Blodir wrote:
duel gap player wrote:I don't like the anti air change because it will bring it back to the days when bombers had no counters from ground.

Anti-air should be able to kill a bomber in one pass otherwise it is broken. A sam can kill a startegic bomber in one pass as well and I hear no one complaining about it. People just want their 'I-win' button back.

Sam is op af. It completely disables air game after a certain point on majority of maps


In it's area of denial. It does not completely disable air but it makes it inefficient to fight over sams as it should. Be more tactical and use land to take out sams or take out targets without sams.

Sams can't move but your planes can and you are just doing lazy tactics here complaining about it
duel gap player
Crusader
 
Posts: 31
Joined: 16 May 2018, 16:07
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Balance patch 3696 Feedback Thread

Postby Wesmania » 16 May 2018, 23:01

Weren't SAMs made really cheap exactly because at some point T3 air completely dominated games?
Wesmania
Contributor
 
Posts: 391
Joined: 19 Nov 2014, 19:17
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 79 times
FAF User Name: MazorNoob

Re: Balance patch 3696 Feedback Thread

Postby IceDreamer » 16 May 2018, 23:13

Wesmania wrote:Weren't SAMs made really cheap exactly because at some point T3 air completely dominated games?


Yes, they were.

It still does.

The buff wasn't enough.
IceDreamer
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 2607
Joined: 27 Dec 2011, 07:01
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 488 times

PreviousNext

Return to Balance Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest