What? Is rewarding micro copyrighted or something? Is it bad for FAF gameplay?
Yes its bad. Because tactical part of the game should stay over micro and apm thing. I know, at 2k+ levels tactics is alwyas nearly perfect so the gameplay comes to micro and apm only. But not everyone is 2k. And looks like balance team doesnt take us into account. If I do better eco, better raiding and better tech than my oppounent, I should win battle of my 5 harbs vs his 3. With this balance it becomes questionable.
Is the /s there because you know the comparison is retarded and you're preemptively poking fun at the people holding that opinion?
Since when its hard to understand /s? I just liked how 2 range difference pretends to be an advantage and "kiting is now very important".
If you thought loyalist was balanced, you're the meme.
Loyalist wasnt balanced. But dont make it a new titan. It would be good, if they left stun ability for ACU and T4, but applied all hp/damage changes.