Cybran ACU > t2 level+ = useless?

Moderator: JaggedAppliance

Re: Cybran ACU > t2 level+ = useless?

Postby Shai--Hulud » 21 Aug 2015, 13:18

Messages about how op Cybran are keep popping up pretty often here. Of course without any real explanation though. Why do people keep yelling that Cybran are op?
The Spice Must Flow.
User avatar
Shai--Hulud
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 83
Joined: 05 Mar 2015, 14:09
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 25 times
FAF User Name: Shai-Hulud

Re: Cybran ACU > t2 level+ = useless?

Postby --- » 21 Aug 2015, 14:38

Jeez, is it really so hard to differentiate between being op and utterly useless? :roll:
---
Priest
 
Posts: 464
Joined: 26 Sep 2013, 10:24
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 192 times

Re: Cybran ACU > t2 level+ = useless?

Postby Reaper Zwei » 21 Aug 2015, 18:53

Blackster wrote:Jeez, is it really so hard to differentiate between being op and utterly useless? :roll:


Uh... when did anybody say cybran com was op?
Reaper Zwei
Priest
 
Posts: 316
Joined: 08 Oct 2013, 06:58
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 18 times
FAF User Name: Reaper_Zwei

Re: Cybran ACU > t2 level+ = useless?

Postby --- » 21 Aug 2015, 20:59

I didn't say anyone claimed Cybran ACU was op - but that Cybran in general is considered "strongest faction" and thus a stronger ACU would make them even stronger (more OP?). I think this is a bad justification for having the core unit of the game being almost useless.
Btw: considering one faction as being the strongest != one faction in fact being the strongest. And if it was the strongest it would mean one thing only: imbalanced game -> rebalancing needed.
---
Priest
 
Posts: 464
Joined: 26 Sep 2013, 10:24
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 192 times

Re: Cybran ACU > t2 level+ = useless?

Postby yeager » 21 Aug 2015, 21:32

Blackster wrote:I didn't say anyone claimed Cybran ACU was op - but that Cybran in general is considered "strongest faction" and thus a stronger ACU would make them even stronger (more OP?). I think this is a bad justification for having the core unit of the game being almost useless.
Btw: considering one faction as being the strongest != one faction in fact being the strongest. And if it was the strongest it would mean one thing only: imbalanced game -> rebalancing needed.

Well cybran and uef are definitely played more, and cybran is the only faction that has a real shot of winning at every tier vs everyother faction, good use of air and you can beat sera in t2, clever raiding and you can kill aeon in t1, and with some use of stealth you can beat uef in t3 (although uef will tend to kill cybran until exp stage) an you have similar succes in the air and naval game, no other faction is nearly as well rounded, and this is countered by a weak com, forcing you to be just as carefully at every tier as you are strong, this is not a perfect balance, but it works Pretty well, your only real weaknesses are in the units themselves and are hard to exploit (slow aa muzzle velocity, terrain issues or the rhino, turn rate on mantis) the only place you really suffer is in defense, and even the you have amazing arty and tmd, not to mention tml. So either come up with an entire rebalance that makes cybrans weaker all together, or leave the acu be.
User avatar
yeager
Evaluator
 
Posts: 542
Joined: 12 Apr 2015, 03:07
Has liked: 43 times
Been liked: 32 times
FAF User Name: Yeager

Re: Cybran ACU > t2 level+ = useless?

Postby rxnnxs » 22 Aug 2015, 03:02

maybe you take one leg away from cybran acu. then it has to jump around the battlefield.
or gets just one arm! cool!
i think this would be an awesome tweak.
to even it then out, the mantis can fly and also turn on the fly and the brick can go stationary, increasing the range to that of the ravager and adds on top of that 5%

or even better, instead of upgrades, the cybran ACU could change color for 10000 mass and 500000 energy.
the other races can upgrade their legs also and the boots too.. faster walking, jumping around or even flying.
the cybran ACU looks so grim, it does not need to be strong. the enemy runs away.
yes, maybe all other faction should get a morale bar - and when the cybran ACU comes, the morale bar goes down no matter what.
the cybran instead, all have no morale bar, never runs... there is nothing to be afraid of..

the possibilities are endless!
User avatar
rxnnxs
Priest
 
Posts: 346
Joined: 14 Feb 2013, 14:55
Has liked: 92 times
Been liked: 24 times
FAF User Name: rxnnxs

Re: Cybran ACU > t2 level+ = useless?

Postby yeager » 22 Aug 2015, 06:48

Lol
User avatar
yeager
Evaluator
 
Posts: 542
Joined: 12 Apr 2015, 03:07
Has liked: 43 times
Been liked: 32 times
FAF User Name: Yeager

Re: Cybran ACU > t2 level+ = useless?

Postby ZLO_RD » 22 Aug 2015, 08:51

Upgraide that does not allow enemy to know how much hp you got left would buff cyb com and fit in faction style, not sure if technically possible thought
http://www.youtube.com/user/dimatularus
http://www.twitch.tv/zlo_rd
TA4Life: "At the very least we are not slaves to the UI"
User avatar
ZLO_RD
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 2265
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 13:57
Location: Russia, Tula
Has liked: 303 times
Been liked: 400 times
FAF User Name: ZLO

Re: Cybran ACU > t2 level+ = useless?

Postby Reaper Zwei » 22 Aug 2015, 11:50

ZLO_RD wrote:Upgraide that does not allow enemy to know how much hp you got left would buff cyb com and fit in faction style, not sure if technically possible thought

Maybe that's what cloak ought to do even when you have onmi. You just appear as a gray dot.
Reaper Zwei
Priest
 
Posts: 316
Joined: 08 Oct 2013, 06:58
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 18 times
FAF User Name: Reaper_Zwei

Re: Cybran ACU > t2 level+ = useless?

Postby ZeRen » 22 Aug 2015, 12:34

maybe cloak upgrade could cost similar to Sera nano and for cloak commander it would need 5/7/9 000 energy per sec
User avatar
ZeRen
Evaluator
 
Posts: 641
Joined: 03 Aug 2014, 08:22
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 49 times
FAF User Name: ZeRen

PreviousNext

Return to Balance Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest