Balance Teams candidates

[pip]

Ze_PilOt wrote:
The current amount of testers for the current balance patch is rather poor, and I can’t release the patch in that current state.That’s why, once again, we will change how the balance will work.

You have until Friday to assemble a team of players. That group can have any number of players, but not less than 4, and a single leader.
The leader will have to post his group composition in the forum, with a short description of each member, what they want to change and how, and why people should vote for them.
You can be part of several testing groups, as long as you are not the leader of more than one group.

On Friday, I will put the groups on a public vote for the week-end, and the winner will be the official balance team for that patch. That group will decide what need to be tweaked and how, accordingly to their original pledge.

The discussions will be opened to anyone of course, but the members of the group will have the final word on any subject. The leader will have access to the balance mod and will be able to update it as often as he want. (one of the member must know how to edit blueprints).

The team will decide when the tweaks are over, and the leader will have to give me the final values for each change, as well as a short description to put on the change log.

Final rule : The goal is to go forward and finalize the current changes. That’s why any change outside the focus of the current changes will be dismissed (ie. changing the SCU, …).
If you don’t know what is the focus of the current patch, you probably shouldn’t apply to this

[pip]

We formed a team with : Blackheart, Crazed, Lu_Xun_17, Nombringer, TAG_Chosen, Voodoo, Zock and myself.

Leader : pip. perkele player (1200 rating) but good knowledge and experience of the game mechanics and blueprint editing ; replay analyzer ; favorite faction = Nomads, worked on Nomads balance for the last 2 years ; replays addict.

BC_Blackheart : top german player (2360 rating) ; favorite faction = UEF but also plays all other factions ; very active in balance testing 4v4 team games recently ; member of BC clan ; pirate lord.

Crazed : top US player (2209 rating) ; most played faction = UEF, but also lot of games with Cybran and Sera, recently picked Aeon side in GW ; charriot driver.

Lu_Xun_17 : top french player (2359 rating) ; most played faction on FAF = Seraphim but plays regularly all the other factions ; always play with teal blue for some fetish reason.

TEA_Nombringer : good Neo Zelander player (1562 rating) ; favorite faction = Cybran, but has been playing Aeon a bit recently ; member of TEA clan and tea addict.

TAG_Chosen : best perkele player (1967 rating) ; most played faction = Seraphim, but has been playing Aeon and UEF recently ; plays FAF all the time ; member of TAG clan and beer addict.

Voodoo : top german player (2327 rating) ; most played faction = UEF, but has been playing Aeon a lot recently in 1v1 ladder; FAF moderator ; dog lover.

Zock : top german player (2248 rating) ; most played faction = Cybran, but has been playing Aeon a lot recently in 1v1 ; one of the designer of engy mod ; pizza addict.

Why vote for us?

We have deep experience of the game and competitive players of all factions, and belonging to several clans, to ensure best overall balance.

Intention for next patch : fine tuning an already solid patch based on competitive games (especially t2 and t3 balance), add occasional bug fixes.

[Cuddles]

Team is OP, I call for a nerf

[Voodoo]

So guys you know what to do:

Download.jpg (7.24 KiB) Viewed 4154 times

if not:

Hypnotoad_Poster_by_Teh_Lucario.jpg (4.9 KiB) Viewed 4154 times

[Astrofoo]

Umm, I feel like I better vote for you guys or I get banned or something. That is a serious dream team.

[Voodoo]

Not banned, hypnotoaded

[IceDreamer]

Sure, go nuts, just listen to sensible criticism, DON'T jump to conclusions, TEST alternative theories (Replace Cybran Nuke Sub Stealth with something... else?) etc. Don't do anything thick either.

[Voodoo]

Sure, go nuts, just listen to sensible criticism, DON'T jump to conclusions, TEST alternative theories (Replace Cybran Nuke Sub Stealth with something... else?) etc. Don't do anything thick either.

I realy don't understand what you want to say.

[Nombringer]

Sure, go nuts, just listen to sensible criticism, DON'T jump to conclusions, TEST alternative theories (Replace Cybran Nuke Sub Stealth with something... else?) etc. Don't do anything thick either.

I realy don't understand what you want to say.

He means test different solutions and don't do dumb things...

[Voodoo]

Ah ok ^^