speed2's maps

[speed2]

Why not put in 5 mins of effort to give us screenshots that actually can serve as basis for some feedback? I always make sure to do so...

And I'd like to comment on your stuff, but those screenshots you give us always keep me from doing so.

Im lazy but ok, Ive tried something...
So some things you should know, map is center symetrical, I have props and decals only on 1/4 since Tokyto told me I can mirror it but I cant have to put those on other 1/4 as well and then rotate it. Dont look at those mexes slightly of position, thats gonna be fixed. And there are gonna be few civilian building in the middle (6-8) and 2-2 in corner on the walled plateau.
Also some additional wreckages like T1 tanks, inties all over the map.

No jammer crystal this time but walls stay!!

Ok, so here are some more pictures. Hopefully its enough. Like, comment, hate, suggest.

[Tokyto]

I like it, im commenting, i hate it, i suggest to add transport and beetle wrecks in the middle.

[Kalvirox]

I feel this new map is very similar to the old one, except you play midleft/rightmid instead of topleft/botright

[speed2]

I feel this new map is very similar to the old one, except you play midleft/rightmid instead of topleft/botright

Strange, I could see some diferences like
- 5km instead of 10
- only 2 ways to acces mid instead of 4, who controls middle has acces to extra 6 mexes (only 2 in old one and they were easy to raid)
- no main expansions just few mexes on map
- idk maybe its just me but have you look at it? I think its really different

[Kalvirox]

Strange, I could see some diferences like
- 5km instead of 10
- only 2 ways to acces mid instead of 4, who controls middle has acces to extra 6 mexes (only 2 in old one and they were easy to raid)
- no main expansions just few mexes on map

On the other map, if you started from the middle left/right you would still achieve the same effect you had with the other one as far as terrain. Yes the expansions are different but I look at more than that.

I don't mean to be a negative nancy but I don't feel there is as much distinction between them as there otherwise could be.

[Lionhardt]

Much better screenshots.

Well, I don't know about the layout of the map... Spawns look turtle-friendly. Mass spots distribution is kinda weird, lanes are very few. I like the anorganic bits, but even the organic parts of the map look kinda anorganic, which I don't like.

I would remove a few single ,exes and add a few clusters instead.

[Tokyto]

So, we tested it a little bit and:

- gameplay is really good, i really enjoyed it. It is not turtle at all, it's very dinamic and the middle map crossing makes it very interesting
- reclaim balance is even better, not too much, just enough to boost you for a while
- small lakes add a little bit to the gameplay, as well as mountains on sides
- Cybran walls are a big plus, couse cybrans are the best
- the only minus is that the map is done 1/4 and rest is copied, so it doesn't look as good as it would with 1/2
- so currently i would rate this map with great 4/5 and really recommend it

[speed2]

And....its done Check first post. Enjoy!

[Lionhardt]

I had a look at it. I think it looks quite good. But for my taste it is too sterile. I would recommend breaking up the main stratum a little (the cracked earth texture) by putting a randomized cloudy mask over it with another texture.

I personally despise this texture anyway, because it has a metallic shine too it... god knows why...

[speed2]

I would say that its one of the the best textures actually even when it looks bit same. With this one you dont need to try hard and it still looks quite good.