UEF TMD buff.

[Ze_PilOt]

I would like to suggest a buff to uef tmd. I don't understand why they have the worst tmd when they are the 'turtling' 'defensive' faction. I don't know anything about the numbers etc so would need somebody to help.

[Arkansas]

Whats worse about UEF TMD than Sera/Cyb?

Unit db seems to show they have the exact same stats. Does the UEF not have enough turtling advantages already.

[ColonelSheppard]

I'm against this the UEF tmd is ok as it is, no idea what problems you have with it, and i play UEF all day long

[Voodoo]

It's nearly impossible to hold a t2 mml spam with TMD, so yes i would like to see a change here.
Maybe they should shot faster.

[Arkansas]

I think Aeons the one that really needs a buff. Its tiny range and low rate of fire means on a map like isis you need to many of them to cover yourself.

[uberge3k]

I'm strongly against this because UEF already has very few weaknesses to begin with. They don't need one less weakness.

[ColonelSheppard]

I think Aeons the one that really needs a buff. Its tiny range and low rate of fire means on a map like isis you need to many of them to cover yourself.

Aeon is afaik the best one

[Ze_PilOt]

Depend, they are the best against a snipe, but probably worst than UEF ones under constant fire.

[ColonelSheppard]

the problem of non Aeon TML is that there are often 4 tmd's + firing one missle, and i dunno how you want to change this

[Arkansas]

The aeon one has a few problems. Tiny range makes it hard to cover everything and even harder to do it fast. God help you if you lose a choke on isis and your opponent manages to get a tml early. The height of the flare makes them ineffective under shields unless right at the edge, which makes layering them impossible so 2 mml's can beat them. Low rate of fire and short range makes them hard to layer so against a sustained barrage they just don't work.

They are certainly the worst in most situations.

@ the above, increase the range and flare height so layering is easier.