So, i always thought you need a planet to gate into a battle on another planet but right now Cybran managed to defend a planet to which they dont have any connection. Can you always defend a planet while its >50% even without any owned planet next to it? I hope you understand what im trying to say
I know thats hardly a bug report but it really confused me^^
This forum is archived and read only.
Please move to the new forum!
- It is currently 07 Apr 2021, 00:26
Forged Alliance Forever
Forged Alliance Forever Forums
Defending planets without any own planet connected to it
11 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Defending planets without any own planet connected to it
by El_Zinkovich » 24 Jan 2014, 14:11
- Attachments
-
- Really wondering how they managed to defend 52, the planet with the yellow glow
- gw.PNG (306.08 KiB) Viewed 4234 times
- El_Zinkovich
- Crusader
- Posts: 33
- Joined: 08 Jan 2014, 01:18
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
Re: Defending planets without any own planet connected to it
by Ze_PilOt » 24 Jan 2014, 14:20
Are you sure than none of the planet next to it was owned by cybran? Or the planet itself had more than 50% cybran influence? Looks quite red to me.
It's also possible that influence decreased AFTER that game was launched.
It's also possible that influence decreased AFTER that game was launched.
Nossa wrote:I've never played GPG or even heard of FA until FAF started blowing up.
-
Ze_PilOt - Supreme Commander
- Posts: 8985
- Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 18:41
- Location: fafland
- Has liked: 18 times
- Been liked: 376 times
- FAF User Name: Ze_PilOt
Re: Defending planets without any own planet connected to it
by El_Zinkovich » 24 Jan 2014, 14:22
Im 100% sure.
Yeah, the planet itself had more than 50% influence
Yeah, the planet itself had more than 50% influence
Last edited by El_Zinkovich on 24 Jan 2014, 14:24, edited 1 time in total.
- El_Zinkovich
- Crusader
- Posts: 33
- Joined: 08 Jan 2014, 01:18
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
Re: Defending planets without any own planet connected to it
by Ze_PilOt » 24 Jan 2014, 14:23
Well if they managed to defend 136, it means that one of the two planet was over 50% cybran. So I'm 100% sure that one of them was owned by cybran, unless proven otherwise.
Most likely 52 is cybran.
Most likely 52 is cybran.
Nossa wrote:I've never played GPG or even heard of FA until FAF started blowing up.
-
Ze_PilOt - Supreme Commander
- Posts: 8985
- Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 18:41
- Location: fafland
- Has liked: 18 times
- Been liked: 376 times
- FAF User Name: Ze_PilOt
Re: Defending planets without any own planet connected to it
by Ze_PilOt » 24 Jan 2014, 14:24
El_Zinkovich wrote:Im 100% sure.
Yeah, the planet itself had more than 50% influence
So I don't see any problem?
Nossa wrote:I've never played GPG or even heard of FA until FAF started blowing up.
-
Ze_PilOt - Supreme Commander
- Posts: 8985
- Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 18:41
- Location: fafland
- Has liked: 18 times
- Been liked: 376 times
- FAF User Name: Ze_PilOt
Re: Defending planets without any own planet connected to it
by El_Zinkovich » 24 Jan 2014, 14:28
Well, i always got the impression that you can only defend/attack if you have connected planets. But obviously for defending it suffices if the planet that is to be defended has >50%. Thats what i didnt think was possible, but thanks for the elucidation and sorry for the inconvenience.
Just wondering now how Auto-recall is supposed to work on a planet without any connection
Just wondering now how Auto-recall is supposed to work on a planet without any connection
- El_Zinkovich
- Crusader
- Posts: 33
- Joined: 08 Jan 2014, 01:18
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
Re: Defending planets without any own planet connected to it
by El_Zinkovich » 24 Jan 2014, 14:53
Sorry for spamming so hard but this topic really caught my interest.
Can you explain this to me? Since i definitely can't
Can you explain this to me? Since i definitely can't
- Attachments
-
- Thats exactly the same conditions as the ones at 52 when it was defended...
- GWagain.PNG (153.04 KiB) Viewed 4217 times
-
- I asked a cybran player about this
- faf-chat.PNG (12.93 KiB) Viewed 4217 times
- El_Zinkovich
- Crusader
- Posts: 33
- Joined: 08 Jan 2014, 01:18
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
Re: Defending planets without any own planet connected to it
by ZLO_RD » 24 Jan 2014, 15:41
you can start attack before you lost link, that is only way to do something like this as far as i know
http://www.youtube.com/user/dimatularus
http://www.twitch.tv/zlo_rd
TA4Life: "At the very least we are not slaves to the UI"
http://www.twitch.tv/zlo_rd
TA4Life: "At the very least we are not slaves to the UI"
-
ZLO_RD - Supreme Commander
- Posts: 2265
- Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 13:57
- Location: Russia, Tula
- Has liked: 303 times
- Been liked: 400 times
- FAF User Name: ZLO
Re: Defending planets without any own planet connected to it
by El_Zinkovich » 24 Jan 2014, 15:48
But when the Sera player attacked, the Cybran link was gone already. Still this drone manged to defend
- El_Zinkovich
- Crusader
- Posts: 33
- Joined: 08 Jan 2014, 01:18
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
Re: Defending planets without any own planet connected to it
by Wild_Green » 25 Jan 2014, 16:05
I also was defended, when a planet has no connection to any other planet of defenders faction with more than 50%
Just thought that there was a rule change. Will post it next time with logs.
Just thought that there was a rule change. Will post it next time with logs.
- Wild_Green
- Avatar-of-War
- Posts: 57
- Joined: 22 Mar 2013, 17:59
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 0 time
- FAF User Name: Wild_Green
11 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest