Salvation vs Emissary swith position

[Ithilis_Quo]

What is your opinion about switch aeon rapid fire artilery stats with T3 artilery ?
Where emmisar would be mavor style game ender (less effective) cca 1600range 1500dps and salvation would cost as emmisar, but would have about 500dps 850 range and split missile as have ?

why this?
plenty of ppl lock on emmisar as most op artilery, + emmisar is grafical 50% bigger as salvation + is more logical that spread projectile would have less range as one projectil + spread projectile is much more effective against army as one projectil that is much more effective against building, game ender want at first end with building. + its more fraction diversity, when aeon can have different artilery as others - deadly against units, but weaker against base.

But i dont want to change nothing, only ask on your opinion about this... ?

[NewForumAccount]

The Emissary already is very different to the other arty, since it is the only one that can reliably snipe a single target, but with its long reload most shields will regenerate before the second shot hits.
The "cheaper" salvation would just act like the cybran artillery with more range.

[Col_Walter_Kurtz]

Ehm, no. Salvation is not for use against armies but good against shields because of the split shells. And there is a Mavor already.

[Ithilis_Quo]

. Salvation is not for use against armies but good against shields because of the split shells.

is is good not because split, but because 2500dps and 3,6 sec reload time

[Col_Walter_Kurtz]

But you don't need the accuracy as with a single shell.

[Ithilis_Quo]

but salvation is much better accucate, it have 0.22 firing randomnes, emisar have 0.35. another arty are much less accurate, that is only artifical changet because it have long range, but no real sense

so with split projectil you dont need aim as good as with oters, but still salvation is 2. most preccies units in game (mavor have 0.18)