faf client UI analysis and redesign

Moderator: keyser

faf client UI analysis and redesign

Postby spooky9 » 28 Jul 2014, 23:26

Hi,
I'll try to keep this post as condensed as possible, though be warned - it's not going to be short.

I believe that at some point most of faf client users thought - this could look/behave better and although the client has pretty much everything required to play a game, I believe it's suffering from 'mature software' syndrome. Most of projects developer over a longer period of time tend to loose UI/UX features due to various reasons - time constraints, new contributors, 'functionality over looks'...
This is normal, but in order to attract new users and keep the picky old ones, once in a while a UI refresh is needed.

I want to strongly state one thing here: I'm not picking on the choices, neither am I trying to criticize the developers - as a concerned user, I'm just trying to help, so on with the subject.

Current UI
There are a few things that are inconsistent in the current UI.
Some sections (What's new, leader boards, livestreams, vaults(?)) are a ui wrapper around a web browser whereas others are not. Yes this is a common practice (steam does that and so does origin) but they have the resources to keep the look consistent with the non-web rest of the app - so they can pull this off, faf can't - sorry.

The non-web components (chat lobby, coop missions, find games, tournaments, replays and vaults) have sometimes drastically different UI/UX thus leaving the user confused when switching between them (I remember that it took me a while to get used to this)

The inconsistencies:
the sidebar:
on the right:
Image
on the left:
Image
also left but a bit wider:
Image
and no sidebar... or half the screen sidebar (imagine content here - it's hard to get a screenshot with content on this screen):
Image
as a matter of fact, after a few months of using faf, I'm still confused on how the tourneys screen works - it's just totally different than all the others

search/filter:
this is a filter:
Image
and this is a filter (although it says search):
Image
and this is a filter:
Image
and this is a filter:
Image
and last but not least:
Image

dialogs:
there are a lot of popup dialogs and although it's probably not possible to get rid of them all, it is possible to reduce their number or move the information delivered by them to a less intrusive spot. I mean 'connecting', 'downloading', 'updating'.. and the likes.

navigation:
This image should sum up the problem:
Image
that's 4 levels of tabs, not counting the leaderboard bottom tab - that's too much.

responsiveness:
leaderboards and tourneys are a good example of the client misbehaving. You enter the leaderboard, you get a popup 'connecting'. Sometimes it connects, sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes it connects after switching the tabs a few times. The main issue here - if there's a connection problem - tell the user. Don't leave a blank screen - it leaves the user wondering if the server has a problem, or the client has a problem or maybe something else is a problem.

ladder popper:
Every time you get a notification with the suggested latter match, the screen real estate is reduced. This may be a personal preference, but I'm a bit annoyed by ui elements that shift size suddenly.

sorting:
This is a difficult one. The problem here is that if you're looking for a custom game, the screen refreshes itself periodically (which is understandable) but if you're unlucky, and the game you want to join is the last one in a row, then after that refresh it's often the case that you 'loose sight' of it because something jumped in higher in the list.the edge case of that behavior is you double click in the same moment that the jump occurs and you join a different game that you wanted to. (I was actually a witness of that happening when a guy entered a lobby and after 30sec wrote 'hmm... I think I joined the wrong game').

These are some of the 'big picture' problems, but there are also others like this:
Image
and
Image
These have a very similar structure, though look drastically different

or these:
Image
and
Image
These provide the same thing, the difference is the origin (online or local) but that difference is not that important to the user, so in this case the screens could be exactly the same (except maybe for a link/button to open local dir or open in browser)

If you keep looking, you can find more, but these should be enough to prove my point. Now criticism itself is only good if you provide an alternative, so here's mine. Note that I am not an interaction designer, nor a graphical designer. I'm just a guy who pays attention to these things, so without further ado, here's my suggestion to solve some of the mentioned problems.

First of all, introduce a new chrome. It has 2 'modes' - sidebar or no sidebar. There is a question whether it should be on the left or on the right - perfect solution - make it configurable, suggested solution - on the right (because most current screens have it there)

no sidebar:
Image

with sidebar:
Image

There's also a handle between the sidebar and the content box - that should allow to resize and collapse (just like on the current chat screen)

Here's a screen with some explanations:
Image

There are a few things to be noted here. "What's new", "Tutorials" and "Live streams" are missing. Why? well, mostly because they're the browser-wrapper screens. I'm not suggesting to get rid of them - the content there is precious, I'm just suggesting to move them.
As for "What's new" - I'll touch on that later. "Tutorials" and "Live streams" will have their place in the app main menu. Tutorials are hardly a dynamic section and although it would be great if they were, let's face the facts here. It'll be enough if there's a subsection in the "Help" menu item that lists all the tutorials or better yet - links to the wiki page which contains all of the tutorials. That way we keep the UI clean the the content can still be dynamic. Tutorials are not FAF client functionality.
"Live streams" - same changes here. Either link to twitch with the filter (after all, that's what's done in the current pane) or provide a link to wiki.
There's another reason to remove these form the client's 'direct view'. This is duplicated content. It's available on the website and if you're using the client, there's a huge chance you've visited the website at least once.

Labels are missing - that's just to gain space. It is easier to locate the right thing when you have a label, but the faf client is an app that will be used frequently (at least that's the goal) and icons are a great way to familiarize the user with the UI. It's easier to spot the right icon than to scan for the desired text - that's been proven by UX tests. And for those who are new - tooltips for each icon. If we're on this subject - I'd suggest tooltips for every UI element. They provide the help needed but do not clutter the UI.

Non interactive notifications in the bottom right. These are the notifications that currently appear in modal popups. This should only include short text and possibly a progress bar or progress indicator as well as state error messages (no connection, download error...)

FAF icon in the top right corner. This has twofold functionality. First - it gives the client identity - that's a trick used almost everywhere. Second, this provides an anchor for alerts/notifications/news. Here's how it could look like:
Image
First notice the glow on the icon. That's a visual effect I adapt to notify a user about important interactions. That should be pulsating to catch attention (animations attract the eye).
Second - the 'balloon' has prev/next/close buttons on the bottom. (clicking outside of the balloon should close it as well). The size should be dynamic, although that's more of a suggestion than a rule. It should have max width and height but if the content is small, so should the balloon. This does introduce one problem - the 'jumping size'. I assume that most of the time, there's only going to be one alert item so this should not occur often but will occur eventually.
This is an element that could actually hold web content. Although in the perfect case, the content would be laid out to fill the balloon nicely, this may be technically problematic or just not worth the hassle, to this is actually the only element which I'd consider a valid candidate to host a browser, although - one news at a time, not one big element with scroll bar (btw, a scroll bar should be included in the balloon so that it's possible to fit longer news items - it's not on the design - that's my bad)

Player stats
This will probably (re)trigger a flame debate. Yes, I have tracked the debate concerning rating and am actually a fan of the steps taken. If it were my decision, I'd probably hide the rating everywhere and just present the 'game quality' indicator (this is actually the way quake live solved it) but let's face it - people get attached to their 'numbers' so instead of fighting it, embrace it.
The avatar (not every one has it) is of course a placeholder. If a user does not have/use an avatar a substitute icon should be used (empty rectangle or a generic icon)

The avatar/generic icon is a click anchor which when triggered brings this up:
Image

This element introduces some new functionality, but hopefully not a lot. The chars are taken from the current client, just stripped of the modal window and some controls that ... at least in my case don't work.

The 'last game' part is displayed based on the last replay (either from online vault or local archive - depends which one is newer, although just taking the local replay is a viable choice). APM is already accesible through PattogoTehens replay parser so the code is there. The 'play' icon starts the replay that the stats are taken from.
As for the global stats - I'm not sure if the current data supports this, if it does - great, if not - possibility to improve.

Player stats are a subject that I've seen pop up on the forum a few times. This suggestion is very simplistic. There are tons of other stats that would be useful, but that's a separate subject.

Section icons. These have the same functionality as in the current client - switching content. The reason I placed them on top is simple - save space. The top bar it going to be there anyway so might as well use the space for something.

'The thing under the icons' - that's my take on the ladder match popup. Here's how it looks expanded:
Image

and here are some screens where this is being 'active':
Image
Image

It uses the same pulsating glow effect that the news icon does. Pulsating is an indication of activity so it can replace the progress bar currently used. Also, the 'select maps' button is gone because that's a configuration thing and should be placed in "settings -> ladder -> select maps".

These screens only touch on the window chrome problems. They do not address the design of each screen. They do not provide a solution for consistent search/filter or other layout elements presented earlier.
The reason for this is simple - I want to check if this subject at least catches some attention and if it's to be considered as an implementation possibility. If that's the case, I'd love to spend some more time to try to address these issues.

As I said earlier, I'm no designer. If you're reading this post and you are a designer I encourage to make your suggestions or expand on the ones I posted here - after all, that's what open source is about.

Final note.
I realize that what I'm suggesting here is sort of a revolution and I do not expect anyone to drop all their activities and start working on improving the UI. What I would like to achieve is awareness of the problem.
FAF is struggling for new users, and we all know that it's been referred to as 'the ugly client' in steam forums more than a few times. The game itself is complicated (and that's its beauty), but I don't think that the program used to play it should have the same trait.

EDIT:fixed image links
Last edited by spooky9 on 30 Jul 2014, 14:10, edited 3 times in total.
spooky9
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 67
Joined: 07 Nov 2013, 19:03
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 5 times
FAF User Name: spooky9

Re: faf client UI analysis and redesign

Postby Ze_PilOt » 29 Jul 2014, 08:38

Feel free to redesign whatever you want:

https://bitbucket.org/thepilot/modular-client/

This is not a forum for suggesting stuff but for doing things, so I'm moving this to the right forum.
Nossa wrote:I've never played GPG or even heard of FA until FAF started blowing up.
User avatar
Ze_PilOt
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 8985
Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 18:41
Location: fafland
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 376 times
FAF User Name: Ze_PilOt

Re: faf client UI analysis and redesign

Postby nine2 » 29 Jul 2014, 14:26

ALL image links broken
nine2
Councillor - Promotion
 
Posts: 2416
Joined: 16 Apr 2013, 10:10
Has liked: 285 times
Been liked: 515 times
FAF User Name: Anihilnine

Re: faf client UI analysis and redesign

Postby spooky9 » 30 Jul 2014, 14:13

Thanks for the heads up partytime. Links fixed.
spooky9
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 67
Joined: 07 Nov 2013, 19:03
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 5 times
FAF User Name: spooky9

Re: faf client UI analysis and redesign

Postby Stefan » 30 Jul 2014, 14:40

Wow, looks really cool, at least compared to current UI. Any chance to get done? Maybe by you with someone willing to help?
Stefan
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 124
Joined: 09 Aug 2013, 14:36
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 1 time
FAF User Name: StefanD

Re: faf client UI analysis and redesign

Postby pip » 30 Jul 2014, 14:46

If you don't intend to work on it yourself, I really don't see the point of this thread.
pip
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 1826
Joined: 04 Oct 2011, 15:33
Has liked: 191 times
Been liked: 86 times
FAF User Name: pip

Re: faf client UI analysis and redesign

Postby spooky9 » 30 Jul 2014, 15:03

I have close to none experience with Qt, but maybe someone who does is willing to pick this up. If time allows, I'll try to learn the framework and start the development myself.
spooky9
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 67
Joined: 07 Nov 2013, 19:03
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 5 times
FAF User Name: spooky9

Re: faf client UI analysis and redesign

Postby Reaper Zwei » 31 Jul 2014, 20:14

pip wrote:If you don't intend to work on it yourself, I really don't see the point of this thread.

This^

To many people on faf willing to suggest stuff that should be done or they think will be cool if done but hardly any of them willing to work on it themselves.
Reaper Zwei
Priest
 
Posts: 316
Joined: 08 Oct 2013, 06:58
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 18 times
FAF User Name: Reaper_Zwei

Re: faf client UI analysis and redesign

Postby Exotic_Retard » 31 Jul 2014, 21:16

i am a theme creator and i am willing to help, but this is much more complex than a theme. i am only familiar with css and things that need to be done to make a theme, but not much else :/
i think the client could look much better, and i like what i have seen in this post, so il just spill my thought on this subject.

existing tooltips can be customised with a theme alone; adding new ones will require more changes
on the subject of tooltips, each tooltip has to describe what it will do, not just be a title for the button (good example: "click to get maps" rather than "map vault")

i disagree about the "select ladder maps"
button being moed to a menu: a lot of users dont bother with menus, and if it was a spanner icon in the corner of your ladder tab, with an appropriate label (click to customize preferred ladder maps) then it would be much better. also in here it will be an icon and not text in the menu (you said yourself that text < icons) and it will remove clutter fomr the menu (10+ items is clutter, 6 is less)

removing any sort of dialogue/popup box will require changes to the client source, and possibly a lot of work

i think that the vaults tab should be once again split into a maps tab and mods tab. why? most people dont know to go there, and instead ask questions in chat. when people ask how to use your client, there is something wrong with the ui. also removing/ adding tabs requires changes in the source.

rating box: this is a controvversial topic so i would pe prepared to abandon that :P i personally like that, but i would not show exact rating outside of the player stats window (as it is now) and instead or global rating show league place, and change in points, and 1v1 rating. this will put more importance on 1v1 rating and thats a good thing becuase its what is supposed to be competetive, not a balance tool.

news page: i think that removing it and putting it in the faf icon isnt a great idea, but i think that using the faf icon as a source of important notifications (polls, maintenance, planned changes) IS a good idea.
so i think that the whats new page should stay, but be remade to be a proper inforamation section. im currently thinking of a design for it, but the point is, i like the way i can see the server statistics at startup and the livestreams as well. its good to be updated on the news and given how too few people read it already, it needs to be looked at.
i also feel that it can be used as the "home page" for the client, something to anchor back to, which i think is important.
(also regarding livestreams tab, i use that to see whos streaming supcom, having this available ont the client is imporant to me, and i kinda agree about removing the streams page, but this needs to be somehere, i think whats new will be a good place for it. )

hope this helps
User avatar
Exotic_Retard
Contributor
 
Posts: 1470
Joined: 21 Mar 2013, 22:51
Has liked: 557 times
Been liked: 626 times
FAF User Name: Exotic_Retard

Re: faf client UI analysis and redesign

Postby ZLO_RD » 31 Jul 2014, 22:07

current UI is little bit tough, but i am SOOOO used to it so i am afraid to change it :(

however i like the concept, hope that will make FAF better for newcomers, GL with new design!
http://www.youtube.com/user/dimatularus
http://www.twitch.tv/zlo_rd
TA4Life: "At the very least we are not slaves to the UI"
User avatar
ZLO_RD
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 2265
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 13:57
Location: Russia, Tula
Has liked: 303 times
Been liked: 400 times
FAF User Name: ZLO

Next

Return to FAF Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest