Better stealth.

[Ze_PilOt]

We don't know. I don't do speculations here. Some were tested and not viable.
So we will see.

You already know what is planned.

[Rienzilla]

Well, judging by your reaction and after carefully re-reading this thread I conclude that you'd rather not have people's opinion on any proposed change. A lot of people voice legitimate concerns here about the solution to a problem which (imho) doesn't really exist; There's not a single post that says "hell yeah! we need a complete change of targeting!"

Do as you see fit, but keep in mind that altering the game in a way that does not correspond to a major (if not the majority) opinion can't be good for the community.

Cheers,
--
Rien

[Ze_PilOt]

Did you really read viewtopic.php?f=36&t=1718 ?

Because you will noticed that all you are saying is already planned before you said it. And was already said on this thread.

I saw plenty of post stating that stealth was useless, .... and by looking at replay, the reason was pretty obvious.

And if I should ALWAYS listen to louder people, or just opinions, the balance testing would be a shitty mess doing every thing and his opposite.
Here, we listen about facts.

[Rienzilla]

Just a quick final reaction to this after our discussion on IRC.

We disagree on the basic question if the stealth change is needed at all. I think it should be reverted because I think it creates more problems than it solves; you think the change is good and needs tweaking.

Given your decision that the stealth change is, in fact, needed, I'm perfectly fine with the tweaks as proposed in 3619.

Cheers,
--
Rien