Others mods requiring .scd should be turned into featured mods.
This forum is archived and read only.
Please move to the new forum!
- It is currently 07 Apr 2021, 03:16
Forged Alliance Forever
Forged Alliance Forever Forums
GPGNET incompatibility list.
Moderator: PhilipJFry
Forum rules
BEFORE POSTING read
Our wiki contains a lot of helpful material about technical issues, try looking there first!
Use the search function before opening a thread! (https://www.faforever.com/forums/search.php)
Read this before posting here: https://wiki.faforever.com/index.php?ti ... cal_Issues
BEFORE POSTING read
Our wiki contains a lot of helpful material about technical issues, try looking there first!
Use the search function before opening a thread! (https://www.faforever.com/forums/search.php)
Read this before posting here: https://wiki.faforever.com/index.php?ti ... cal_Issues
18 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.
by Ze_PilOt » 22 Feb 2012, 15:11
LEM will be integrated. I've to add it in my "We want YOU" thread
Others mods requiring .scd should be turned into featured mods.
Others mods requiring .scd should be turned into featured mods.
Nossa wrote:I've never played GPG or even heard of FA until FAF started blowing up.
-
Ze_PilOt - Supreme Commander
- Posts: 8985
- Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 18:41
- Location: fafland
- Has liked: 18 times
- Been liked: 376 times
- FAF User Name: Ze_PilOt
Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.
by thygrrr » 27 Feb 2012, 13:44
What are the filenames (they are all *.scds, right?) for:
I think I figured out a safe way to blacklist them without modifying people's FA installs (meaning people won't have to uninstall anything).
FAF will just work. It's gonna be magical!
- Sorian AI
- Sorian LEM
- Unit Cap Mod
- ...other incompatible ones?
I think I figured out a safe way to blacklist them without modifying people's FA installs (meaning people won't have to uninstall anything).
FAF will just work. It's gonna be magical!
I waited ten years for Supreme Commander (1997-2007)
and have not a single day felt disappointed with it!
and have not a single day felt disappointed with it!
-
thygrrr 
- Posts: 783
- Joined: 18 Nov 2011, 17:08
- Location: Germany
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 3 times
Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.
by Doompants » 27 Feb 2012, 21:46
thygrrr wrote:What are the filenames (they are all *.scds, right?) for:
- Sorian AI
- Sorian LEM
- Unit Cap Mod
- ...other incompatible ones?
I think I figured out a safe way to blacklist them without modifying people's FA installs (meaning people won't have to uninstall anything).
FAF will just work. It's gonna be magical!
oooooOOOOOOOOOooooh! That *will* be magical.
also, if you plan on putting the LEM in, is that going to include the handicap mod?
- Doompants
- Avatar-of-War
- Posts: 101
- Joined: 24 Feb 2012, 06:47
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
- FAF User Name: Doompants
Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.
by thygrrr » 28 Feb 2012, 10:01
Handicap mod needs LEM, so yeah for now, that will mist likely go, too.
I like Handicap a lot for friendly games among noobs and non-noobs, though. I shall always voice my wish to see it or something like it in FAF's powerlobby variant.
It does interfere strongly with the accuracy of TrueSkill, however.
I like Handicap a lot for friendly games among noobs and non-noobs, though. I shall always voice my wish to see it or something like it in FAF's powerlobby variant.
It does interfere strongly with the accuracy of TrueSkill, however.
I waited ten years for Supreme Commander (1997-2007)
and have not a single day felt disappointed with it!
and have not a single day felt disappointed with it!
-
thygrrr - Posts: 783
- Joined: 18 Nov 2011, 17:08
- Location: Germany
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 3 times
Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.
by Doompants » 29 Feb 2012, 22:45
I have played for years with a static group of 6 guys on Monday nights, and for friend games where you know who is really good, and who has a little trouble, the handicap mod was great.
I get that it must mess with Truescore though.. would it make more sense to include a handicap option in Powerlobby, and have.it exempt you from score changes any time the handicap is enabled? anytime I want to include a handicap for friends I'm not going to be interested in score anyway.
I get that it must mess with Truescore though.. would it make more sense to include a handicap option in Powerlobby, and have.it exempt you from score changes any time the handicap is enabled? anytime I want to include a handicap for friends I'm not going to be interested in score anyway.
- Doompants
- Avatar-of-War
- Posts: 101
- Joined: 24 Feb 2012, 06:47
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
- FAF User Name: Doompants
Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.
by Ze_PilOt » 29 Feb 2012, 23:25
Of course. Most of the problem is having the time to implement LEM
Nossa wrote:I've never played GPG or even heard of FA until FAF started blowing up.
-
Ze_PilOt - Supreme Commander
- Posts: 8985
- Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 18:41
- Location: fafland
- Has liked: 18 times
- Been liked: 376 times
- FAF User Name: Ze_PilOt
Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.
by Doompants » 01 Mar 2012, 00:47
Yeah, I would expect that it's a little low on your list of priorities, but it would still be cool. 
- Doompants
- Avatar-of-War
- Posts: 101
- Joined: 24 Feb 2012, 06:47
- Has liked: 0 time
- Been liked: 0 time
- FAF User Name: Doompants
Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.
by Ze_PilOt » 01 Mar 2012, 01:00
It was already on the list :
https://bitbucket.org/thepilot/forged-a ... ntegration
https://bitbucket.org/thepilot/forged-a ... ntegration
Nossa wrote:I've never played GPG or even heard of FA until FAF started blowing up.
-
Ze_PilOt - Supreme Commander
- Posts: 8985
- Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 18:41
- Location: fafland
- Has liked: 18 times
- Been liked: 376 times
- FAF User Name: Ze_PilOt
18 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest