RNG's big WWPC map pool whinge

Tournaments announces and results.

Moderators: FtXCommando, Stups

RNG's big WWPC map pool whinge

Postby Sir Prize » 09 Aug 2014, 03:59

So after that one page of slightly derailed stuff in the main WWPC thread about maps, I thought I'd put what I'd like to see happen here and if it needs any more discussion we can go ahead here.

- the three maps that didn't piss people off get added, they're decent maps imho (I like Balvery too because I like intense ACU micro battles, but too much drama).

- removing Haven Reef, possibly Crossfire Canal and any other maps that are broken or imba, I know ZLO has a list.

- finalists have to announce their maps ahead of the final so you can't just get ambushed by meta knowledge - this happened at least once in each one of the four U1100 finals I've been in. AND/OR

- really cut down the map pool and possibly rotate it. Disregard the incorrect point I'd made about the 90 maps completely - 50 maps is a lot and puts all you people with 1000+ games played at an advantage over me people with 200ish games. Kind of doens't matter when maps are announced, you can watch a replay and sandbox a build and it's ok.

I think point 3 fixes pretty much all possible map problems to be honest.
User avatar
Sir Prize
Evaluator
 
Posts: 573
Joined: 24 May 2014, 10:29
Has liked: 77 times
Been liked: 91 times
FAF User Name: Sir-Prize

Re: RNG's big WWPC map pool whinge

Postby Mad`Mozart » 09 Aug 2014, 11:21

Map announcement sounds like a great idea :) I support it (if anyone cares lol)
I imagine it like people announcing their maps when they sign up and champions within some time period after they win/defend.

About map pool not so sure though, i like my freedom of picking almost any map i like and dont want it to be taken away. But on the other hand, Petric's shit uber reclime maps where he has 100% win chance vs me so... yeah :D But if we start to limit map pool it could go retarded pretty easy with some people left butthurt about taking off their favorite map so imo its good as it is now.
Mad`Mozart
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: 10 Mar 2013, 19:09
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 431 times

Re: RNG's big WWPC map pool whinge

Postby Blodir » 09 Aug 2014, 11:40

I don't care about any of this but I want to see 2v2 WWPC)
User avatar
Blodir
Contributor
 
Posts: 1175
Joined: 07 Jan 2013, 14:14
Has liked: 489 times
Been liked: 535 times
FAF User Name: Snowbound

Re: RNG's big WWPC map pool whinge

Postby lextoc » 09 Aug 2014, 12:47

Blodir wrote:I don't care about any of this but I want to see 2v2 WWPC)

I don't know if it will be active enough, I'll set it up today and see what happens
I'm watching you!
User avatar
lextoc
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 1057
Joined: 17 Mar 2013, 18:08
Has liked: 287 times
Been liked: 227 times
FAF User Name: lextoc

Re: RNG's big WWPC map pool whinge

Postby Morax » 18 Aug 2014, 15:36

RandomNameGenerator wrote:- removing Haven Reef, possibly Crossfire Canal and any other maps that are broken or imba, I know ZLO has a list.


Why exactly do you want to remove these two maps? I think Haven Reef has some of the most unique and interesting 1v1 mechanics out of any map. A good player truly shows his/her skill by mastering a map like this one as there are MANY strats to be used.

RandomNameGenerator wrote:- finalists have to announce their maps ahead of the final so you can't just get ambushed by meta knowledge - this happened at least once in each one of the four U1100 finals I've been in. AND/OR


Why? If someone doesn't know a map it doesn't mean he/she should get a "get-out-of-jail free" card. To me, being "champion" means you should demonstrate superior map knowledge and a challenger to that champion should put in the time and effort to learn the maps if he/she wants to take that away.

RandomNameGenerator wrote:- really cut down the map pool and possibly rotate it. Disregard the incorrect point I'd made about the 90 maps completely - 50 maps is a lot and puts all you people with 1000+ games played at an advantage over me people with 200ish games. Kind of doens't matter when maps are announced, you can watch a replay and sandbox a build and it's ok.


So someone who is more experienced should not be allowed to demonstrate that talent because it's "unfair?"

I haven't read any solid reasoning as to why certain maps should be taken away, added, or whatever you want out of this debate. I'm not trying to be mean here, but I think you are trying to get on an even level playing field by cutting out material you personally don't know while it's unfair to others participating in the tournament. As you can tell, I happen to like Crossfire Canal and Haven Reef so it's not convincing me...
Maps and Modifications Councilor

M&M Discord Channel

Come join us and help create content with the artists of FAF.
User avatar
Morax
Councillor - Maps and Mods
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: 25 Jul 2014, 18:00
Has liked: 1167 times
Been liked: 662 times
FAF User Name: Morax

Re: RNG's big WWPC map pool whinge

Postby Sir Prize » 21 Aug 2014, 02:34

Urgh, saw this today at work and wrote a big post here spelling out what I thought, and now think, about the map pool situation and why you're wrong on a number of points. Bottom line is nothing's broken, Lextoc knows what I think pretty much and this isn't worth the drama so I'm deleting. See you in our qualifier.

Someone lock this thread.
User avatar
Sir Prize
Evaluator
 
Posts: 573
Joined: 24 May 2014, 10:29
Has liked: 77 times
Been liked: 91 times
FAF User Name: Sir-Prize


Return to Tournaments

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest