TL;DR below for those who just want the gist of what I'm saying.
Let me start this off by saying that I have no clue if this is where this should be, but it's about tournaments, so it makes sense to me.
So this weekend my friends and I participated in the Price of Gap of Rohan tournament. We're all around the same ranking (700-900), so we never really expected to win. But when we played the tournament, we lost every single game we played. A tad disheartening if I don't say so myself. We had practiced all week, every night, to hopefully not lose disastrously. But lose disastrously is exactly what we did.
Some of you may ask why we even joined the tournament. "It's u1400! You can't win against those guys!" Well that is exactly what we thought, but we worked together as a team pretty well and wanted to play something more professionalish and intense than games against randoms. And that is where the tournament came in. Anyone who has played in any sort of organized event for a normally casual game can tell you that, if you want to be there, the experience is often intense and exhilarating. This is exactly why we joined, we wanted to have a new, fun, experience playing the game we love. The problem is that while we will probably try another tournament, if one anywhere near our rank for team games opens up, the vast majority of people will take the experience we had and never want to play like that again. It was literally like being told that all our hard work practicing was for nothing as no matter what we do, we'll lose.
So at this point, you may be thinking "why the hell am I reading someones post complaining about losing in a damn tournament?" Well I hope it's because I make a damn good point and someone who already read this little essay told you to read it. Though it would probably help if I mention my point, huh? So the point of all this is such: With only tournaments for minorities of the community (does anyone actually think that 1000-1600 are "average" joes?), the majority of us are left by the wayside. Though many of us may want to participate in a bigger way, or to even just feel like a part of the community, we can't because there is not a snowballs chance in hell for us to get a single win.
Below I start to go into what I feel is a bit of an elitism issue with the community, so I wanted to make sure everyone understands the connection to the tournaments. The lack of tournaments for the lower ranked players only furthers the possibility to be elitist by some other members of the community. So by having some tournaments for those who are ranked lower, it'll hopefully help bring everyone together.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As I'm not one of those guys who makes a fuss about something but never gives any suggestions about how to make it better, I've thought of a few things that I think will help:
1) A "formal" rename of the bracket currently known as "average joe's" to something which is not a misnomer. I've not thought of any replacements myself, but I don't doubt others can. By calling these players "average" it makes many lower ranked players (the REAL average) feel like they're worse at the game than they are.
2) Have more tournament opportunities for those in the low 1000's / high 100's bracket AT LEAST. Preferably some for the mid 100's as well. As I previously mentioned, I'm not one to make a big stink and not be prepared to help. So I'd be perfectly willing to run these tournaments myself, honestly I think being a tournament director would be kinda fun. Though to be honest I've held off from applying to be a TD because I'm worried they'll take one look at my rank and laugh me out of there. And this is in a lot of ways exactly what I'm trying to get at with some of these points. The community is, intentionally or not, remarkably elitist.
3) Seeing as I just ended up going there, An attempt at removing some of the elitism that seems to be in the background of much of this community. Though I should clarify, I'm not saying that a lot of people are openly elitist, if anything quite the opposite. I've personally only seen a handful of people who were actively behaving this way. The problem is that it's there in the shadows, and always has been as long as I've been around. Take a look at #aeolus any night and you'll find people cracking jokes about "seton's being the only way to play", complaining about low rank players, etc. Now to be absolutely clear, I don't think this has anything to do with these people actually trying to be elistist, more so that everyone else is, so they just go along with it, as is human nature.
Now I'm not delusional, I don't think anyone can change my third point overnight, or even over a couple of months. I just really hope that this is something that the people trying to steer FAF in the right direction are aware of.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So as this is a pretty damn large wall of text, I'm going to try and summarize it into a tidy little TL;DR:
1) There needs to be more tournaments for those under 1000, the REAL "average joes".
2) Terms such as "average joes" referring to people who are far better than the average player really negatively impact the FAF community.
3) The higher level members of the community (who are also the vocal minority) tend to be somewhat unconsciously elitist, something that only splits the community more.