E8400-CV wrote:The higher the number of games; the slower your rating will change.
In team games you can also get a lousy team 15 times in a row and loose 100 points.
this exactly represents why a global only ranking system can't reflect a player's true skill.
Also gaining the true rating of yourself is very hard in global ranking, means if faf were new (ie everyone started up from 0 all over) there would be no way to separate the best players of now in a YEAR from everyone else, which means there would be a pool of players with nothing reliable to rate them according to.
This would lead to unbalanced games where more people rage just because they would think they are in an inferior team and guess what? They would be right for once.
I quite liked the idea of rounding the global ranks to 00's leveling the ground for better team games with less care about ranks. But this severing of the rating system feels like a recession in faf which has been going forward only with renovations.
I think the necessities that brought up this severing decision should be rethought and we shall find a better solution to those necessities. Here is my proposition:
Dump the global rating thing all together!
edit: grammar.