Supreme commander wiki

Talk about general things concerning Forged Alliance Forever.

Moderators: FtXCommando, Ze Dogfather

Supreme commander wiki

Postby noobymcnoobcake » 30 Sep 2012, 12:46

The supreme commander wiki is a huge resource with almost 700 pages and hundreds of pictures. It has tons of information on it but much of it is outdated (3599) and written by noobs who only play against AI in 4 hour games and delete anything you write that goes against this. Anyone think its worth doing anything too like putting in the FAF values for unit costs ect or is it a lost cause?

-Do any of you use it?
-Have any of you changed stuff on it or written any pages?
-Would any of you like to see anything done to it?
-Would any of you be willing to do so if this was the case?

http://supcom.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page
User avatar
noobymcnoobcake
Evaluator
 
Posts: 672
Joined: 17 Sep 2011, 16:34
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 5 times

Re: Supreme commander wiki

Postby Ze_PilOt » 30 Sep 2012, 13:13

He have our own wiki. It's a wiki, you can edit it.
So it means that you can take any relevant part of the supcom wiki and put it in the FAF wiki and update it, as long as you point the original article and credit the original author.
Nossa wrote:I've never played GPG or even heard of FA until FAF started blowing up.
User avatar
Ze_PilOt
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 8985
Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 18:41
Location: fafland
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 376 times
FAF User Name: Ze_PilOt

Re: Supreme commander wiki

Postby Doompants » 30 Sep 2012, 17:40

I would agree that we can just use relevant parts of the supcom wiki to improve the FAF wiki, however at the same time, putting FAF-information in the supcom wiki might help drive traffic to FAF?

Ultimately, I use FAF wiki once in a while, but can't remember the last time I used the supcom one.
Doompants
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 101
Joined: 24 Feb 2012, 06:47
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
FAF User Name: Doompants

Re: Supreme commander wiki

Postby noobymcnoobcake » 30 Sep 2012, 17:43

Anaryl wrote:There's no need to duplicate the data on there at this point.

I agree with this here but there is so much stuff on there that is blatantly wrong and useless information that will do nobody any good at all. Too bad you cant ban people because its a wiki.
User avatar
noobymcnoobcake
Evaluator
 
Posts: 672
Joined: 17 Sep 2011, 16:34
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 5 times

Re: Supreme commander wiki

Postby lafittejean » 16 Feb 2013, 23:50

Sorry about the necro on the thread, but I'd just like to say that while being a more public wikia wiki that is highly vulnerable to edits I would still say that many people new to supreme commander are bound to encounter the http://supcom.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page before they find the FA wiki. I myself formatted the Supreme Commander and SC2 wiki pages when the new wikia hardware effectively destroyed the older wikia format, reminiscent of how the FA wiki looks, a couple years ago. Heck, I even went to the internet archive to rescue the old wiki logo and made a crude SC2 wiki logo also. I've also tried my best to add some of the new developments including FAF a link to which is at the top of the main page. While I may be biased due to my work on the wiki I do think that it's an interesting compendium of information. However you are right that there is little good game play information on the site, but I would like it if someone with a lot more experience could change that. So in conclusion I suppose I'm just saying that you ought to keep the wiki in mind.
lafittejean
Crusader
 
Posts: 16
Joined: 25 Oct 2011, 06:06
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Supreme commander wiki

Postby ColonelSheppard » 17 Feb 2013, 12:18

if we are already at necroing: can anybody tell me how to resize pictures in the wiki
User avatar
ColonelSheppard
Contributor
 
Posts: 2997
Joined: 20 Jul 2012, 12:54
Location: Germany
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 165 times
FAF User Name: Sheppy

Re: Supreme commander wiki

Postby lafittejean » 17 Feb 2013, 20:52

In the wikia wiki to resize you go to source and then have your picture like so: [[Image:UEFGhettoGunships.jpg|right|200px]] The last one controls size(by pixels)
lafittejean
Crusader
 
Posts: 16
Joined: 25 Oct 2011, 06:06
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Supreme commander wiki

Postby Ze_PilOt » 17 Feb 2013, 20:54

Basically the same for FAF wiki (standard wiki nomenclature)
Nossa wrote:I've never played GPG or even heard of FA until FAF started blowing up.
User avatar
Ze_PilOt
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 8985
Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 18:41
Location: fafland
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 376 times
FAF User Name: Ze_PilOt

Re: Supreme commander wiki

Postby ColonelSheppard » 17 Feb 2013, 22:12

got it.. i never worked with wikis before
User avatar
ColonelSheppard
Contributor
 
Posts: 2997
Joined: 20 Jul 2012, 12:54
Location: Germany
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 165 times
FAF User Name: Sheppy

Re: Supreme commander wiki

Postby sasin » 20 Feb 2013, 03:24

Hey,

I'm really new to FAF and I really suck. I had stumbled upon the supcom wiki linked above and had used it when playing some casual games with my friends before I had discovered FAF. For new players, I think the wiki is really useful.

I know that there is a wiki for FAF, here: http://www.faforever.com/mediawiki/inde ... =Main_Page

But, it doesn't have the unit costs/damage statistics and strategy discussion that the supcom wiki has. As I get slaughtered over and over again, I find myself really wishing for an updated version of the supcom wiki. I know that there are updated unit statistics on the complete unit list on FAForever.com, but it'd be really useful to have the strategy discussion as well. For example, in 3599 according to the wiki jesters and the Sera t2 bots were very powerful. When I played with my friends, those were both built en masse. Now, I checked the unit list and see that they have both been buffed, but I've actually not seen jesters built at all in my experience on FAF. I've gotten a little offtrack, but the point here is that short little blurbs written by top or even competent players about the units would be really, really useful for new players like myself. As I try to pitch my friends on how fun this game is, it would help to be able to provide them with a resource as well.

I know there are other resources to use to improve, and you guys do have plenty of noob guides and replays etc. that are very helpful. I'm still improving anyways, but I do think that the wiki would be extremely helpful.

I don't know if the best way to do this is to update the existing wiki (looks annoying if people change your updates back) or to enhance the FAF wiki. If you could have a little strategy section in the complete unit list, that would be helpful as well.

Great job with the game and the support you guys provide so far. I have a ton of fun with this!
sasin
Priest
 
Posts: 368
Joined: 11 Feb 2013, 04:09
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 43 times
FAF User Name: sasin

Next

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest