tatsu wrote:but seriously though that's some pretty dicey choice of words.
github has a bad user interface
just because you figured it out doesn't make it good
also, just because worse interfaces exist, doesn't make other bad interfaces good. Is that clear now?
mlg
Morax as more or less a unrewarded stand-in for the councillor made a judgement call based on both A: prior understanding of the users (work) ethic and morality and B: no evidence to the contrary (the map working), there of course isn't any mention of possible other issues such as faulty mass points, imbalances, and the like in the screen-caps, where we know due to lack of diligence:
MLGTASTIC wrote:So i had an unknown underwater forest on one of the side of the maps and you ddint even inform me ?
it could have very easily happened.
Furthermore, the user in question could have very happily went to anyone else working as a unrewarded councillor stand-in and gotten a second, more neutral judgement call and easily had the issue resolved, but instead decided to not care anymore about his hour(s) put into content creation than he does just wanting to slander a candidate at a sensitive time period.
MLGTASTIC wrote:Explain who else i have fustrated except you.
Me! I don't like having to spoon-feed people google searches at 4am and neither does anyone else.