Any hint about the diference ?

[vongratz]

OK, A cruiser can have two diferent AA systems. But the model shows exactly the same weapon design for both. What is the right thing?

Olaris AA Artillery Cannon (Anti Air, Normal): 480 dps, range: 0 - 65, area damage radius: 4projectile: 120 damagemuzzle velocity: 20fire cycle: 2 projectiles every 0.5 seconds, 240 damage totalturret pitch: 0° ±180° (180°/s), turret yaw: 0° ±180° (180°/s)firing randomness: 2.5, firing tolerance: 2

Cleo AA Gatling Gun (Anti Air, Normal): 333.33 dps, range: 0 - 45projectile: 50 damagemuzzle velocity: 100fire cycle: 2 projectiles every 0.3 seconds, 100 damage totalturret pitch: 0° ±180° (180°/s), turret yaw: 0° ±180° (180°/s)firing tolerance: 0.5

[speed2]

You will find out that seraphim is not the most beautiful faction. Most of the units look the same, so this is no surprise.

[ZeRen]

You will find out that seraphim is not the most beautiful faction. Most of the units look the same, so this is no surprise.

yea, that is reason why I dont play Sera, too confusing models

[Plasma_Wolf]

Yeah, you can't check just by looking at the models.

The easiest way to tell the difference is by taking a plane within a radius of 65 of a cruiser, but keep it out of a radius of 45. The cannon that fires is the Olaris. And then you have to remember left or right and whether the cruiser was pointed downwards or upwards on the map.

T1 and T2 stationary AA has the same problem. They're essentially the same model but the T2 is marginally larger.

[XenoJade]

You will find out that seraphim is not the most beautiful faction. Most of the units look the same, so this is no surprise.

T1, T2 and T3 stationary anti-air all look the same.

I also happened to look at t3 air factories for seraphim and noticed a really ugly model clip on the factory where these two parts of the model don't properly align. A minor thing, but it just goes to show that the Seraphim don't care for aesthetics much, lol.