Battlecruiser

Post here any idea about current FA Balance.
REMINDER : This is NOT a community balance forum. The thread ideas won't be used in a patch.
Forum rules REMINDER : This is NOT a community balance forum. The thread ideas won't be used in a patch.

Battlecruiser

Postby Raging_Squirrel » 05 Sep 2011, 17:01

Cheap T3 navy brought by 3603 had made it a bit OP, I think.
The point is while you invest in T2 ships, an UEF player can easily stop his production and give you the lead on the sea while getting a T3 naval fac and a Battlecruiser. It all costs ~9k mass which is 4 or 5 Destroyers.

But battlecruiser eats those 5 destros at breakfast, 5 more at dinner and 10 more at supper combined with shield boats. :(
Torp bombers also ain't help here much.

My suggestions are:
1. Rasie mass cost
and/or 2. Raise buildtime
(haven't thought of exact values)
Never argue with an idiot. He will bring you down to his level and beat with experience.
User avatar
Raging_Squirrel
Priest
 
Posts: 494
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 16:53
Location: Russia
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times
FAF User Name: Raging_Squirrel

Re: Battlecruiser

Postby FunkOff » 05 Sep 2011, 17:06

Battlecruisers are strong against T2 ships, but have several weaknesses:
#1: They are helpless against air
#2: They are nearly helpless against subs
#3: They are strongly countered by battleships

Also, I doubt your assertion that a battlecruiser can take 5 destroyer... maybe in series (one-at-a-time), but not in parallel (all at once). If you make battlecruisers ineffective against lower tech surface ships, then there's really no point in building one in the game. Also, battlecruisers being countered by battleships gives every faction a direct counter to them on teh water and also makes it useful to build battleships.... they are highly under-used.

I vote no change.
FunkOff
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 1863
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 17:27
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 43 times
FAF User Name: FakeOff

Re: Battlecruiser

Postby Ze_PilOt » 05 Sep 2011, 17:15

#4 they are slow as shit.
Nossa wrote:I've never played GPG or even heard of FA until FAF started blowing up.
User avatar
Ze_PilOt
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 8985
Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 18:41
Location: fafland
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 376 times
FAF User Name: Ze_PilOt

Re: Battlecruiser

Postby Gowerly » 05 Sep 2011, 20:12

#5 The other factions have their own advantages:
Cybran - stealth, BCs can't hit what they can't see
Aeon - Mobile Shields. Cheaper and more effective than shield boats
Seraphim - t3 subs.
Gowerly
Evaluator
 
Posts: 507
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 10:52
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
FAF User Name: Gowerly

Re: Battlecruiser

Postby Zock » 05 Sep 2011, 20:55

Aeon Shields may be cheaper, but they are mutch less effective then shield boats imo. They are just way too slow and the shield size is too small to cover ships without heavy micro. Sera got also Shields btw.

Cant say anything about the battlecruiser, i rarly see him ingame wich might would be different if he were very strong.
gg no re

ohh! what a pretty shining link! https://www.youtube.com/c/Zockyzock
User avatar
Zock
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: 31 Aug 2011, 22:44
Has liked: 173 times
Been liked: 397 times
FAF User Name: Zock

Re: Battlecruiser

Postby Gunseng » 06 Sep 2011, 06:27

I'd have to say no change. They're are awesome and UEF needs them. Just don't try countering them with destroyers. They're designed to take out ships like destroyers, use something else lol.
Gunseng
Avatar-of-War
 
Posts: 69
Joined: 06 Sep 2011, 05:24
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Battlecruiser

Postby Ze_PilOt » 06 Sep 2011, 09:07

Zock wrote:Aeon Shields may be cheaper, but they are mutch less effective then shield boats imo. They are just way too slow and the shield size is too small to cover ships without heavy micro. Sera got also Shields btw.

Cant say anything about the battlecruiser, i rarly see him ingame wich might would be different if he were very strong.


They are strong, but I think not a lot of people are used to the new T3 naval balance and fear to go for it. But T3 navy destroy everything.
Nossa wrote:I've never played GPG or even heard of FA until FAF started blowing up.
User avatar
Ze_PilOt
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 8985
Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 18:41
Location: fafland
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 376 times
FAF User Name: Ze_PilOt

Re: Battlecruiser

Postby Lu_Xun_17 » 06 Sep 2011, 10:24

There were a big problem in 3599 with T3 navy, however now it's perfect. We saw some epic T3 navy battles with 10 battlecruiser vs 10 battlecruisers! awesome :D

i vote for no change :)
User avatar
Lu_Xun_17
Contributor
 
Posts: 860
Joined: 31 Aug 2011, 22:56
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 224 times
FAF User Name: LuXy

Re: Battlecruiser

Postby FunkOff » 06 Sep 2011, 18:26

Lux, 10 battlecruisers vs 10 battlecruisers? And no battleships?!?!!? I'm appalled D-:
FunkOff
Supreme Commander
 
Posts: 1863
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 17:27
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 43 times
FAF User Name: FakeOff


Return to FA Balance Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest