Forged Alliance Forever Forged Alliance Forever Forums 2017-12-05T14:45:33+02:00 /feed.php?f=67&t=15538 2017-12-05T14:45:33+02:00 2017-12-05T14:45:33+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157572#p157572 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]>
anyway, thanks, i'm eager to learn how the game works in its insides, i'll check that stuff !

EDIT : yup, i think the value you said is something different, i compared with the data from the megalith, for which each of the two main turrets are described separately, but refer to different "bones".
i'll have to check the 3D model to know the layout of those bones though...

Statistics: Posted by lapantouflemagic — 05 Dec 2017, 14:45


]]>
2017-12-05T10:44:27+02:00 2017-12-05T10:44:27+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157545#p157545 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]>
every unit has a value in the unit bp for the layeroffset which determines the difference between the lowest part of the unit and wherever the change from the land to the water layer occurs (please correct me if that was not 100% correct @exotic)

as you can see the layer offset is -1 for the scathis - if you were to set it to 0 then it would be "under water" as soon as one of its tiny legs gets wet

if you really want the scathis to shoot from under water then i suggest you look at the code in EQ (i assume the weapon just got allowed to fire/deploy from under water)

Statistics: Posted by PhilipJFry — 05 Dec 2017, 10:44


]]>
2017-12-05T10:37:43+02:00 2017-12-05T10:37:43+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157540#p157540 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]>
i went in sandbox mode for a little while to test a few things, in order to "prove" my point, which is that technically, the scathis can fire from "underwater" just as any amphibious unit, which means that its current inability to do so in more than a puddle comes from the was the game is coded.

i'll have to learn a bit more about modding, but i'll make it work the way i thinik it should =)

Statistics: Posted by lapantouflemagic — 05 Dec 2017, 10:37


]]>
2017-12-03T22:56:54+02:00 2017-12-03T22:56:54+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157432#p157432 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]>
Since it has about 3x the dps of a t3 arty, maybe making it 2x the cost with a moderate range could be a reasonable fix. So just increasing the cost to 140-150k, but also increasing the range back to where it was before, or maybe slightly more. I don't think you'll see it very often anyway (since often building one t3 arty, then adding a second would be better in a lot of situations) but it might be a useful buff. Either that or reducing the cost and keeping its current range.

Alternatively, it could also be a pretty cool t4 if it was cheaper, with less dps, (and possibly with faster movement speed). Maybe 50k-60k mass, 600-800 dps, and 200-250 range. This would kinda make it sortof in between a fatboy and a t3 stationary arty (somewhat like the nomads t4s?), but outranging t2 arty. Basically it seems useless as a stationary arty right now because it's range is too low, but then it's too expensive to use in any other way because taking it out of your base shielding makes it extremely vulnerable.

Statistics: Posted by Steel_Panther — 03 Dec 2017, 22:56


]]>
2017-12-02T05:22:50+02:00 2017-12-02T05:22:50+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157375#p157375 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]>
That's kind of a shame, we could try small things and see how it goes

Statistics: Posted by lapantouflemagic — 02 Dec 2017, 05:22


]]>
2017-12-01T20:50:06+02:00 2017-12-01T20:50:06+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157359#p157359 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]> Statistics: Posted by TheKoopa — 01 Dec 2017, 20:50


]]>
2017-12-01T20:15:41+02:00 2017-12-01T20:15:41+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157358#p157358 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]> Statistics: Posted by Farmsletje — 01 Dec 2017, 20:15


]]>
2017-12-01T18:44:54+02:00 2017-12-01T18:44:54+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157350#p157350 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]>
stealth won't help you can already stealth it with a deceiver for pretty much no cost

imo the issue is not that the scathis is not a great tool on dual gap but the fact that dual gap is not a good map

Statistics: Posted by PhilipJFry — 01 Dec 2017, 18:44


]]>
2017-12-01T18:29:23+02:00 2017-12-01T18:29:23+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157348#p157348 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]>
PhilipJFry wrote:
you better start liking mods cause the scathis won't shoot from under water anytime soon :>
also @medicraze not sure what you mean by that afaik the scathis does work from under water in EQ

well, it depends, as i wrote in the first post, maybe it is meant to be able to, but can't because something was not coded carefully enough =)

Statistics: Posted by lapantouflemagic — 01 Dec 2017, 18:29


]]>
2017-12-01T18:23:36+02:00 2017-12-01T18:23:36+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157345#p157345 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]> Statistics: Posted by Deribus — 01 Dec 2017, 18:23


]]>
2017-12-01T18:10:18+02:00 2017-12-01T18:10:18+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157344#p157344 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]> also @medicraze not sure what you mean by that afaik the scathis does work from under water in EQ

Statistics: Posted by PhilipJFry — 01 Dec 2017, 18:10


]]>
2017-12-01T18:07:31+02:00 2017-12-01T18:07:31+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157343#p157343 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]> Statistics: Posted by Farmsletje — 01 Dec 2017, 18:07


]]>
2017-12-01T18:05:04+02:00 2017-12-01T18:05:04+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157342#p157342 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]>
Farmsletje wrote:
Fixed in equilibrium



what do you mean fixed in equilibrium...better be "fixed" as in, not working in a puddle anymore lol

Statistics: Posted by Medicraze — 01 Dec 2017, 18:05


]]>
2017-12-01T18:02:19+02:00 2017-12-01T18:02:19+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157340#p157340 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]>
thanks though !

Statistics: Posted by lapantouflemagic — 01 Dec 2017, 18:02


]]>
2017-12-01T17:46:37+02:00 2017-12-01T17:46:37+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=15538&p=157337#p157337 <![CDATA[Re: A small thing about the scathis...]]> Statistics: Posted by Farmsletje — 01 Dec 2017, 17:46


]]>