Forged Alliance Forever Forged Alliance Forever Forums 2016-09-16T01:04:59+02:00 /feed.php?f=67&t=13133 2016-09-16T01:04:59+02:00 2016-09-16T01:04:59+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=13133&p=135467#p135467 <![CDATA[Re: The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination]]> Statistics: Posted by NapSpan — 16 Sep 2016, 01:04


]]>
2016-09-14T17:39:56+02:00 2016-09-14T17:39:56+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=13133&p=135336#p135336 <![CDATA[Re: The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination]]>
AFGHAN PSYCHO wrote:
biass wrote:Please have a serious reexamination of the patch notes, please ^.^


I did, it reeks of autism and heavily buffing UEF while further strengthening Aeon's position as dominant air.


nice dude

also, if all factions get the same nerf to ras, how does aeon become stronger?

Statistics: Posted by biass — 14 Sep 2016, 17:39


]]>
2016-09-14T17:23:00+02:00 2016-09-14T17:23:00+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=13133&p=135334#p135334 <![CDATA[Re: The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination]]>
biass wrote:
Please have a serious reexamination of the patch notes, please ^.^


I did, it reeks of autism and heavily buffing UEF while further strengthening Aeon's position as dominant air.

Statistics: Posted by AFGHAN PSYCHO — 14 Sep 2016, 17:23


]]>
2016-09-14T10:57:16+02:00 2016-09-14T10:57:16+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=13133&p=135294#p135294 <![CDATA[Re: The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination]]>
AFGHAN PSYCHO wrote:
Seraphim already lack RAS SACUs and now you want to nurf their RAS and also FORCE people to go Aeon in order to play air?

Not sure about what makes you think that people are forced to go AEON for air in the newest patch. Isn´t that already pretty much the case now? Every seton game has 2 Aeons for Air, every gap has 2 Aeons for Air. T3 Torp bombers and Air Gunships are pretty much all the arguments needed, aside the strong Aeon ASF. I need a better explanation on this point.

Statistics: Posted by Vanguard — 14 Sep 2016, 10:57


]]>
2016-09-14T07:49:29+02:00 2016-09-14T07:49:29+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=13133&p=135293#p135293 <![CDATA[Re: The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination]]> Statistics: Posted by biass — 14 Sep 2016, 07:49


]]>
2016-09-14T05:32:00+02:00 2016-09-14T05:32:00+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=13133&p=135286#p135286 <![CDATA[Re: The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination]]>
These are the patch notes http://content.faforever.com/patchnotes/3660.htm

Statistics: Posted by angus000 — 14 Sep 2016, 05:32


]]>
2016-09-14T03:48:31+02:00 2016-09-14T03:48:31+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=13133&p=135278#p135278 <![CDATA[The New Beta Needs Serious Re-examination]]> Statistics: Posted by AFGHAN PSYCHO — 14 Sep 2016, 03:48


]]>