Forged Alliance Forever Forged Alliance Forever Forums 2016-07-20T22:59:02+02:00 /feed.php?f=67&t=12703 2016-07-20T22:59:02+02:00 2016-07-20T22:59:02+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130953#p130953 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]>
Aside from the shitty aeon TML/MMls, there is without a doubt a need to shift strategy when someone introduces them into an engagement.

Please stop playing noob stuff and become the FunkOff you were back in GPG days, pl0x 8-)

Statistics: Posted by Morax — 20 Jul 2016, 22:59


]]>
2016-07-08T05:29:11+02:00 2016-07-08T05:29:11+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130209#p130209 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]> Statistics: Posted by biass — 08 Jul 2016, 05:29


]]>
2016-07-08T03:33:27+02:00 2016-07-08T03:33:27+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130201#p130201 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]>
Viba wrote:
Can we just move all lichking balance posts into off topic then? :lol:

I know that not, can we move all troll posts there? :twisted:

Statistics: Posted by Lieutenant Lich — 08 Jul 2016, 03:33


]]>
2016-07-07T19:44:49+02:00 2016-07-07T19:44:49+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130183#p130183 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]>

Statistics: Posted by Viba — 07 Jul 2016, 19:44


]]>
2016-07-07T17:21:42+02:00 2016-07-07T17:21:42+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130175#p130175 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]>
Spoiler: show
Guys, seriously. Enough trolling. Use off topic for that. In balance discussions people expect serious replies.

Statistics: Posted by Lieutenant Lich — 07 Jul 2016, 17:21


]]>
2016-07-07T13:21:03+02:00 2016-07-07T13:21:03+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130166#p130166 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]> Harbs
Bad:
This Thread

Statistics: Posted by JaggedAppliance — 07 Jul 2016, 13:21


]]>
2016-07-07T12:53:48+02:00 2016-07-07T12:53:48+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130163#p130163 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]>
biass wrote:
im so close to writing a serious reply but i know this is trolling so

Idk FunkOff is a known noob after all he might be serious about this.

Statistics: Posted by BenDover — 07 Jul 2016, 12:53


]]>
2016-07-07T12:46:18+02:00 2016-07-07T12:46:18+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130161#p130161 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]> Statistics: Posted by lextoc — 07 Jul 2016, 12:46


]]>
2016-07-07T11:11:29+02:00 2016-07-07T11:11:29+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130153#p130153 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]>
crispyambulance wrote:
T2 stationary artillery spam


Omf T2 stationary artillery spam! Right on brother! Never seen anything more ridiculously powerful than that, I just cower in fear when I hear T2 artillery.

Statistics: Posted by Um ZiniZini — 07 Jul 2016, 11:11


]]>
2016-07-07T10:14:57+02:00 2016-07-07T10:14:57+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130150#p130150 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]>
possible solutions:
- make mmls/mobile arty ignore shields
- give mobile t3 aa a teleport ability (with just enough range to dodge Asswasher bombs)
- make torpedos oneshot frigates

Statistics: Posted by PhilipJFry — 07 Jul 2016, 10:14


]]>
2016-07-07T10:00:08+02:00 2016-07-07T10:00:08+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130149#p130149 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]>
T3maa may get small radar and smaller omny senzor. On size as t3 spy plane. That will help use range more effectively and will work also as intel unit in army stack.

Statistics: Posted by Ithilis_Quo — 07 Jul 2016, 10:00


]]>
2016-07-07T08:32:52+02:00 2016-07-07T08:32:52+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130144#p130144 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]>
BenDover wrote:
Idk I've seen MMLs push back pd creep to great effect can't say they're bad. Nuke sub is decent as well for a sneaky hidden nuke it should take long to build u can always assist if you're impatient..

With positive eco it takes only 5 minutes to build nuke, is not much.

Statistics: Posted by NapSpan — 07 Jul 2016, 08:32


]]>
2016-07-07T07:22:30+02:00 2016-07-07T07:22:30+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130139#p130139 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]> Statistics: Posted by biass — 07 Jul 2016, 07:22


]]>
2016-07-07T06:58:17+02:00 2016-07-07T06:58:17+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130138#p130138 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]>
FunkOff wrote:
Bad:
- T2 MMLs. All of them. (Even the cybran one)
- T3 mobile artillery. All of them (even the cybran one)
- T3 mobile AA
- T1 subs
- T3 strategic missile subs

wut

t3 mobile arty could see a aoe buff so they are better against units, aside from that...

Statistics: Posted by angus000 — 07 Jul 2016, 06:58


]]>
2016-07-07T06:04:08+02:00 2016-07-07T06:04:08+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12703&p=130136#p130136 <![CDATA[Re: Stuff that is good vs stuff that is bad]]> Statistics: Posted by Hawkei — 07 Jul 2016, 06:04


]]>