Forged Alliance Forever Forged Alliance Forever Forums 2016-04-01T05:27:28+02:00 /feed.php?f=62&t=10377 2016-04-01T05:27:28+02:00 2016-04-01T05:27:28+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=124334#p124334 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]> Statistics: Posted by biass — 01 Apr 2016, 05:27


]]>
2016-03-31T23:50:41+02:00 2016-03-31T23:50:41+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=124323#p124323 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]>

Chrono Dampener countered by Cybran? Going to have to see how to counter it. But perhaps, avoiding the com? Lure him in the open and come from behind and smash his power grid? For all we know, ACU doesn't produce enough E to support Chrono Dampener so once all power is off (or at least most of it), his super ability will fall.

Statistics: Posted by Lieutenant Lich — 31 Mar 2016, 23:50


]]>
2016-03-31T18:41:48+02:00 2016-03-31T18:41:48+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=124301#p124301 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]>
LichKing2033 wrote:
I used Chrono Dampener successfully several times. I could run it on a hydro (had 2 hydros and ~20 T1 pgens but ~70% E went into bomber spam and aurora spam, so) and had excess. It is not an upgrade that'd require a T2 pgen, like shield is.


20 t1 pgens is a lot. Chrono takes 200 to run, and with a hydro and 20 t1 pgens you were pulling 500 power. If 70% of that went into units, you only had 150 power left to run Chrono (500 - 500*0.7). So you were only firing 3/4 as often as you could've been. If your opponent had destroyed your hydro, that would've been 50 power left for hydro, do only firing 1/4 as often as max.

20 t1 pgens... while you were building those they should have been building something to kill them with. :) The fact that you had all that stuff (bomber spam? So your opponent wasn't building inties?) tells me your opponent wasn't reacting properly.

Statistics: Posted by codepants — 31 Mar 2016, 18:41


]]>
2016-03-30T00:27:37+02:00 2016-03-30T00:27:37+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=124179#p124179 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]>

I used Chrono Dampener successfully several times. I could run it on a hydro (had 2 hydros and ~20 T1 pgens but ~70% E went into bomber spam and aurora spam, so) and had excess. It is not an upgrade that'd require a T2 pgen, like shield is.

Statistics: Posted by Lieutenant Lich — 30 Mar 2016, 00:27


]]>
2016-03-29T18:47:50+02:00 2016-03-29T18:47:50+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=124132#p124132 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]> something to go around and hit their power with.

Statistics: Posted by codepants — 29 Mar 2016, 18:47


]]>
2016-03-29T05:33:54+02:00 2016-03-29T05:33:54+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=124049#p124049 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]>
I never said to pd 'creep' as it were but just make two or three where his acu is going to scare him away, and then punish his now wasted investment somewhere else

Statistics: Posted by biass — 29 Mar 2016, 05:33


]]>
2016-03-29T01:54:07+02:00 2016-03-29T01:54:07+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=124043#p124043 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]>
Koppas original suggestion of focusing on their units with your Com was the right one. If you have units that outrange it, keep them out of the range. The best thing you can do against it IMO is just avoid it, if you avoid it with minimal/no ground loss (very possible) they get no value out of it.

Statistics: Posted by briang — 29 Mar 2016, 01:54


]]>
2016-03-28T23:45:48+02:00 2016-03-28T23:45:48+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=124027#p124027 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]>

Yes, I do. It is expensive. And yet, I had a Cybran player get one in ladder by ~18 minutes. Do you have other ideas, briang? Besides biass's good idea with PD creeping?

Statistics: Posted by Lieutenant Lich — 28 Mar 2016, 23:45


]]>
2016-03-28T01:34:40+02:00 2016-03-28T01:34:40+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=123945#p123945 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]>
it also one shot's aurora's as well

Otherwise, PD

Statistics: Posted by biass — 28 Mar 2016, 01:34


]]>
2016-03-28T00:31:34+02:00 2016-03-28T00:31:34+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=123943#p123943 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]> Statistics: Posted by TheKoopa — 28 Mar 2016, 00:31


]]>
2016-03-27T19:44:35+02:00 2016-03-27T19:44:35+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=123924#p123924 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]> Statistics: Posted by briang — 27 Mar 2016, 19:44


]]>
2016-03-27T18:57:21+02:00 2016-03-27T18:57:21+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=123917#p123917 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]> Statistics: Posted by Lieutenant Lich — 27 Mar 2016, 18:57


]]>
2016-02-02T20:01:57+02:00 2016-02-02T20:01:57+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=118915#p118915 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]> Statistics: Posted by TheKoopa — 02 Feb 2016, 20:01


]]>
2016-02-02T04:00:25+02:00 2016-02-02T04:00:25+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=118858#p118858 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]>
KrogothFTW wrote:
Theoretically, the Wagner might fair better; its two surface weapons fire every two and four seconds. I understand the Percival's slow firing weapon is hardly effected.



Yeah, because percivals are LIFE! So damn good and awfully useful.

Statistics: Posted by Lieutenant Lich — 02 Feb 2016, 04:00


]]>
2015-07-27T20:45:25+02:00 2015-07-27T20:45:25+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=10377&p=105757#p105757 <![CDATA[Re: Non-Conventional Chrono Dampener]]> Statistics: Posted by DeimosEvotec — 27 Jul 2015, 20:45


]]>