Forged Alliance Forever Forged Alliance Forever Forums 2014-01-28T04:27:46+02:00 /feed.php?f=58&t=5804 2014-01-28T04:27:46+02:00 2014-01-28T04:27:46+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=63476#p63476 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]> Statistics: Posted by Gerfand — 28 Jan 2014, 04:27


]]>
2014-01-28T04:27:05+02:00 2014-01-28T04:27:05+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=63475#p63475 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]>
anyway

Statistics: Posted by Gerfand — 28 Jan 2014, 04:27


]]>
2014-01-17T21:41:38+02:00 2014-01-17T21:41:38+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=62449#p62449 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]> Statistics: Posted by pip — 17 Jan 2014, 21:41


]]>
2014-01-09T17:11:09+02:00 2014-01-09T17:11:09+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=61477#p61477 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]> UEF vs Aeon

Mongoose suck still
Bombers better but still not very effective
Auroras were less dominant but aeon range/rate was still pretty uncounterable

Statistics: Posted by Gorton — 09 Jan 2014, 17:11


]]>
2014-01-07T23:13:26+02:00 2014-01-07T23:13:26+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=61313#p61313 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]> http://www.mediafire.com/download/r6rii ... .fafreplay

Replay vault was throwing a fit... Noticed two odd things

1 - Is it just me or were the T1 Aeon Interceptors WAY too strong? Might just be me being paranoid and crap, but those seriously wrecked my UEF ones, and also beat F/Bs later on.

2 - Fatboy's Air Staging function appears to be broken. I checked in the normal game and it's working fine, but not in Balance Testing. Odd no?

Balance wise things look great. The new Flack is powerful, the new Gunships are nicely done, and Aurora get totally boned to hell once Strikers get in range (How it SHOULD be).

Statistics: Posted by IceDreamer — 07 Jan 2014, 23:13


]]>
2014-01-05T09:51:46+02:00 2014-01-05T09:51:46+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=61055#p61055 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]>
Not really the best, or most even game in terms of gameplay, but you get to see a some good aroura vs striker, and some mongoose later on.

Statistics: Posted by Nombringer — 05 Jan 2014, 09:51


]]>
2014-01-05T06:33:23+02:00 2014-01-05T06:33:23+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=61053#p61053 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]> Statistics: Posted by Swkoll — 05 Jan 2014, 06:33


]]>
2014-01-04T19:04:32+02:00 2014-01-04T19:04:32+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=61012#p61012 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]>
laPPen wrote:
i have 2 setons replays with balancetest from yesterday, but one is outdated again since there was a new patch inbetween both games.
both games are pretty non-saying and i dont really recognized any of the changes. should i still upload them?


For Seton games, here are the main things that can be checked out:
- T3 gunships (including Restorers) : how do they fare now?
- Sera navy : how are the nerfs to the Destroyer and the t3 sub?
- strategic subs : they should be useful for Seton games
- Sera Resto field level 2 used to repair structures.

And of course, any other issue that may arise during a game.

Statistics: Posted by pip — 04 Jan 2014, 19:04


]]>
2014-01-04T11:14:06+02:00 2014-01-04T11:14:06+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=60971#p60971 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]> Statistics: Posted by Zock — 04 Jan 2014, 11:14


]]>
2014-01-04T11:03:07+02:00 2014-01-04T11:03:07+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=60969#p60969 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]> both games are pretty non-saying and i dont really recognized any of the changes. should i still upload them?

Statistics: Posted by laPPen — 04 Jan 2014, 11:03


]]>
2014-01-03T17:55:45+02:00 2014-01-03T17:55:45+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=60859#p60859 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]>

I'll add my games to this post with edit

1. AEON VS AEON ON THETA PASSAGE
http://faforever.com/faf/vault/replay_v ... id=1711501
Notes: ACU missed alot, don't know if it was before (normally don't play Aeon but wanted to check speed)

Statistics: Posted by lextoc — 03 Jan 2014, 17:55


]]>
2013-12-31T14:52:40+02:00 2013-12-31T14:52:40+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=60528#p60528 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]>
I only worry about the testing as there are future tournaments that the patch could impact and I want to see nice games.

Statistics: Posted by Cheva — 31 Dec 2013, 14:52


]]>
2013-12-31T13:43:34+02:00 2013-12-31T13:43:34+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=60519#p60519 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]>
Cheva wrote:
Lol

Sounds like a lot of work to watch an average replay. However I would guess that the people getting desychs just haven't updated their balace patch mod as pip could watch it fine. On the other hand if the patch number has already changed again then we may not be able to go back to see it.

Lets focus on the actual changes in the balance patch :( I still only see mostly replays from Nom. Which is good of Noms for doing but there needs to be more people with replays and proof! Is there any other tangible testing for the patch ?


Chevalier



Was probably more to do with an issue that could maybe let us actually understand desynchs ^

But yes.


Image


That being said I think Aulex posted a nice hour long 3v3 in the casting thread that would be good to analyse, aside from that, I havent seen any :(

Statistics: Posted by Nombringer — 31 Dec 2013, 13:43


]]>
2013-12-31T13:38:58+02:00 2013-12-31T13:38:58+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=60518#p60518 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]>
Sounds like a lot of work to watch an average replay. However I would guess that the people getting desychs just haven't updated their balace patch mod as pip could watch it fine. On the other hand if the patch number has already changed again then we may not be able to go back to see it.

Lets focus on the actual changes in the balance patch :( I still only see mostly replays from Nom. Which is good of Noms for doing but there needs to be more people with replays and proof! Is there any other tangible testing for the patch ?


Chevalier

Statistics: Posted by Cheva — 31 Dec 2013, 13:38


]]>
2013-12-31T05:34:10+02:00 2013-12-31T05:34:10+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=5804&p=60499#p60499 <![CDATA[Re: Replays]]>
Surely anyone with that patch installed, should be able to watch it?

Statistics: Posted by Nombringer — 31 Dec 2013, 05:34


]]>