Forged Alliance Forever

Re: t2/t3 switch

2013-06-17T04:38:18+02:00

laPPen wrote:
This might be true for 1 vs 1 in team games it is easy to skip t2.
It happens quite often and is no big risk to do it normaly

I don't see a problem there. A fast T3 factory will result in either an "elite squad" of T3 units. Or A small number of T3 leading a horde of T1. Both of these combinations could be defeated by a dedicated T2 spam, which is more easily done with engie mod. The fact that this tradeoff is so risky and expensive are ample compensation for the increased combat efficiency T3 units provide.

If we forced players down one single line of force composition, what would be the point? Whether a player uses T1 Spam, T1/T2, T2 Spam, T1/T3 or T2/T3 or T3 or T4. There should be siduations and circumstances when each of these approaches is appropriate.

Statistics: Posted by Hawkei — 17 Jun 2013, 04:38

Re: t2/t3 switch

2013-06-01T15:43:40+02:00

This might be true for 1 vs 1 in team games it is easy to skip t2.
It happens quite often and is no big risk to do it normaly

Statistics: Posted by laPPen — 01 Jun 2013, 15:43

Re: t2/t3 switch

2013-06-01T14:36:29+02:00

I don't think the amount of people rushing t3 land really makes this an issue. t3 land requires a t2 power and t2 land hq if you let your opponent get these while he building little to no units, you probably should spam more.

Statistics: Posted by Swkoll — 01 Jun 2013, 14:36

Re: t2/t3 switch

2013-05-31T14:35:47+02:00

With engiemod this is no longer a factor

Statistics: Posted by Nombringer — 31 May 2013, 14:35

t2/t3 switch

2013-05-31T14:24:20+02:00

I think t2 time is currently a bit too short. Do you think so too?

To solve this i would increase buildtime /mass? of t3hq. Do you have any other suggests?

Statistics: Posted by Bibblson — 31 May 2013, 14:24