Forged Alliance Forever Forged Alliance Forever Forums 2013-06-29T19:38:22+02:00 /feed.php?f=57&t=4142 2013-06-29T19:38:22+02:00 2013-06-29T19:38:22+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4142&p=47222#p47222 <![CDATA[Re: Cybran T2 Point Defense Cerberus]]> Statistics: Posted by VoiceofReason — 29 Jun 2013, 19:38


]]>
2013-06-29T10:14:05+02:00 2013-06-29T10:14:05+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4142&p=47203#p47203 <![CDATA[Re: Cybran T2 Point Defense Cerberus]]> Statistics: Posted by pip — 29 Jun 2013, 10:14


]]>
2013-06-28T22:20:15+02:00 2013-06-28T22:20:15+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4142&p=47181#p47181 <![CDATA[Re: Cybran T2 Point Defense Cerberus]]>
78 a shot in its .7 seconds makes the proper dps. Not 30, or 33. Check!

So its actually doing about 42, and 39 DPS... CHECK CHECK CHECK.... CHEECCCKKKK

Statistics: Posted by VoiceofReason — 28 Jun 2013, 22:20


]]>
2013-06-28T13:01:39+02:00 2013-06-28T13:01:39+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4142&p=47164#p47164 <![CDATA[Re: Cybran T2 Point Defense Cerberus]]>
VoiceofReason wrote:
For current FAF version, its 33 a shot, in balance testing its 30 a shot it seems.


Yes, that's it. It means DPS is 100 in balance patch and 110 in current FAF. In PD wars, where PD shoot at each other, the cybran one is the weakest, but against moving targets, they are still quite good, and amazing against t1. The cybran PD is also cheaper and they have excellent MML and a cheap shield so I don't think it's a problem for overall balance.
The also have a cool new fx in balance patch, so it's a buff 8-)

Statistics: Posted by pip — 28 Jun 2013, 13:01


]]>
2013-06-28T08:37:35+02:00 2013-06-28T08:37:35+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4142&p=47149#p47149 <![CDATA[Re: Cybran T2 Point Defense Cerberus]]> Statistics: Posted by VoiceofReason — 28 Jun 2013, 08:37


]]>
2013-06-28T07:58:35+02:00 2013-06-28T07:58:35+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4142&p=47145#p47145 <![CDATA[Re: Cybran T2 Point Defense Cerberus]]> Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 28 Jun 2013, 07:58


]]>
2013-06-28T04:54:36+02:00 2013-06-28T04:54:36+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4142&p=47140#p47140 <![CDATA[Re: Cybran T2 Point Defense Cerberus]]> Statistics: Posted by VoiceofReason — 28 Jun 2013, 04:54


]]>
2013-05-31T19:57:53+02:00 2013-05-31T19:57:53+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4142&p=44329#p44329 <![CDATA[Re: Cybran T2 Point Defense Cerberus]]>

The cybran one is fixed, not the seraphim one.

Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 31 May 2013, 19:57


]]>
2013-05-31T19:14:06+02:00 2013-05-31T19:14:06+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4142&p=44315#p44315 <![CDATA[Re: Cybran T2 Point Defense Cerberus]]>
1v1 vs sera PD and sera PD was left with like less than 10% health

now sera pd is left with 40-50% HP.

I thought you guys wanted it back as before, you need to increase its DPS, or no one will ever build the Cybran t2 pd.
Either that or the Sera PD is buffed heavily.

Its about balancing not about killing a unit. Sorry but this is WRONG. It makes no sense to make the unit as ppl just ignore it as if it was not there.

Statistics: Posted by TAG_ROCK — 31 May 2013, 19:14


]]>
2013-05-31T07:58:11+02:00 2013-05-31T07:58:11+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4142&p=44191#p44191 <![CDATA[Re: Cybran T2 Point Defense Cerberus]]>
qai wrote:
unitdb is not up to date.


It is ?

Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 31 May 2013, 07:58


]]>
2013-05-31T01:25:05+02:00 2013-05-31T01:25:05+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4142&p=44167#p44167 <![CDATA[Re: Cybran T2 Point Defense Cerberus]]> The problem: Afaik Cerberus dps got buffed cause it was missing, missing is fixed now so dps restored/changed

:?: Why: So Cerberus will stay good/balanced.

:idea: Suggestion: Those who balanced Cerberus know better what was changed. Its better now than what is was before.

Statistics: Posted by qai — 31 May 2013, 01:25


]]>
2013-05-31T01:16:46+02:00 2013-05-31T01:16:46+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=4142&p=44166#p44166 <![CDATA[Cybran T2 Point Defense Cerberus]]> Cerberus DPS (damage = 10 from 11).

unitdb is not up to date.

Statistics: Posted by qai — 31 May 2013, 01:16


]]>