E8400-CV wrote:Did you ever test it? Run Furmark @ Extreme Burn-in while at the same time also having some torture test load up the CPU. Then monitor CPU clock frequency and see if the same frequency persists for 20 minutes or if it drops. And if that frequency even is full turbo.
Statistics: Posted by IceDreamer — 10 Apr 2015, 16:17
Statistics: Posted by Aurion — 10 Apr 2015, 13:26
E8400-CV wrote:No, I would enable the option to kick if it slows down bad and welcome you in.
Haswell CPU's run a bit cooler than previous generations. If I run my i7-2860QM full-bore, it will run a lot hotter.
Zoram wrote:E8400-CV wrote:Decent laptops for FA gaming are unicorns.
I must be playing with a unicorn.
(the unicorn being an ASUS ROG G75VW for over two years ago (i7 -3610QM @2.30Ghz - 8GB RAM)
Not to say it never lags, as I don't often end up in over 60 minutes seton games, but so far, so good.
rootbeer23 wrote:hotfog wrote:well I have a question.
I have often heard that FA doesn't take advantage of multicore cpu's.
that is true.
the long answer is more complicated: all physics simulation is single threaded.
some graphics output or sound control is executed in a variety of threads, but those usually
account for 10% extra load. if there are too many computations in the sim thread, the game
will slow down. since all things that are not simulation can run on all processors concurrently,
1 core will be slightly slower than 2+ cores.
short answer is: FA can take advantage of 1.1 cores.
Question :
What is required to make FA run well and fast?
Is it CPU only, does graphics card have a role? Does Ram have a role? Perhaps background programs have an impact?
any low range current GPU should be able to run FA on full detail on a big screen.
probably a CPU integrated graphics core will be able to do so too. so the graphics card
is generally not a problem.
rootbeer23 wrote:
if you dont have enough RAM for the whole FA process to fit in, you are in a world of pain.
but who doesnt have 2GB ram?
rootbeer23 wrote:Is there a risk that showing CPU model will create unfair kicks? Oh yes for sure. The reason? Ignorance.
So, put up some info and educate us please.
Then, even people with poor requirements to run FA (who are currently unaware of this fact) will know. So many times I have been in game that slows down due to bad cpus and I always get targeted as my game ping is usually between 220 and 360 - which doesnt cause lag but because it is higher than the people playing from europe, I am assumed to be the cause of the game lag. People are unaware of the issue of cpu lag. This is just an example of the upset that ignorance can cause.
So, let's inform them. Perhaps we could get speed2 to do a speed school of FAF video on cpu lag to educate.
Just saying.
network latency is of course not relevant in this case.
hardware specs are important for performance though. so a kick would only be unfair
if it was not justified. i mean thats almost a tautology, no?
Statistics: Posted by E8400-CV — 10 Apr 2015, 11:41
Question :
What is required to make FA run well and fast?
Is it CPU only, does graphics card have a role? Does Ram have a role? Perhaps background programs have an impact?
iow, INFORM the FAF community as there is no clear description anywhere that i can find of an ideal system to run FA.
Is there a risk that showing CPU model will create unfair kicks? Oh yes for sure. The reason? Ignorance.
So, put up some info and educate us please.
Then, even people with poor requirements to run FA (who are currently unaware of this fact) will know. So many times I have been in game that slows down due to bad cpus and I always get targeted as my game ping is usually between 220 and 360 - which doesnt cause lag but because it is higher than the people playing from europe, I am assumed to be the cause of the game lag. People are unaware of the issue of cpu lag. This is just an example of the upset that ignorance can cause.
So, let's inform them. Perhaps we could get speed2 to do a speed school of FAF video on cpu lag to educate.
Just saying.
Statistics: Posted by rootbeer23 — 10 Apr 2015, 10:15
Statistics: Posted by HotFog — 10 Apr 2015, 09:34
Statistics: Posted by Aurion — 10 Apr 2015, 08:51
Statistics: Posted by Crotalus — 10 Apr 2015, 04:49
Aurion wrote:E8400-CV wrote:...
Decent laptops for FA gaming are unicorns.
Statistics: Posted by Zoram — 10 Apr 2015, 02:02
IceDreamer wrote:E8400-CV wrote:Enough of the laptop nonsense slowing down the game to -4 or noobs lying about "the cpu score is bugged for me". I've found 99% (rounded down!) to be pure bullsh*t.
When hovering over the cpu score, let it show the CPU model. Just like it's listed in Windows System properties. For example;Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz 3.30 GHz
That way it's easier to pick out the laggers. Like the people with hot-head laptop cpu's that will overheat and slow down.E8400-CV wrote:
No, I want to play without slowdowns. Having a better idea of what someone's system is, will make that easier to achieve.
OK so I join your game, and you see this: "Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4720HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz".
Do I get to play? If you're going with a CPU models ideology, you must know quite a bit about them, so you know HQ means it's a mobile chip, and I'm therefore on a laptop. 2.6GHz is also fairly slow compared to most desktop CPUs. So what's your verdict?
And yes, this post is a trap, but please give your honest answer: Would you kick that CPU?
Statistics: Posted by E8400-CV — 10 Apr 2015, 01:22
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz 3.30 GHz
E8400-CV wrote:
No, I want to play without slowdowns. Having a better idea of what someone's system is, will make that easier to achieve.
Statistics: Posted by IceDreamer — 10 Apr 2015, 01:01
Statistics: Posted by Crotalus — 10 Apr 2015, 00:55
E8400-CV wrote:...
No, I want to play without slowdowns. Having a better idea of what someone's system is, will make that easier to achieve.
Ceneraii wrote:
Well this is setons rage I guess, laptops don't usually do well there ;D
Statistics: Posted by E8400-CV — 10 Apr 2015, 00:26
Statistics: Posted by HotFog — 10 Apr 2015, 00:26