Forged Alliance Forever

Re: About buldings and intel

2014-07-04T07:29:23+02:00

That's why I said 'regarding targetting'. It would be a first step

Statistics: Posted by Wakke — 04 Jul 2014, 07:29

Re: About buldings and intel

2014-07-04T01:05:05+02:00

That would not be enough, even if you did that, a player would still know if a building went down, because the intel icon gets darker when it does,

Statistics: Posted by Paul Kauphart — 04 Jul 2014, 01:05

Re: About buldings and intel

2014-07-03T21:50:38+02:00

Paul Kauphart wrote:
From this Topic http://www.faforever.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7942&start=40#p76477.

Do you think it would be a good idea to have intel on buildings never change when they are stealthed or outside of sensor range ? Meaning a building that you scouted will remain on intel screen and targetable even once it's gone, and building that gets constructed won't appear until you get a sensor fix (that is already the case), and buildings should not disappear from intel once a stealth field comes online (I remember reading here that they did disappear in that case).

Also second question, can it be made that way ?

+1. An other way to achieve the desired result regarding targetting would be to make anything that is not in radar (bearing in mind stealth)/vision range untargetable, forcing you to use ground fire.
Not sure how technically feasible that is though.

Statistics: Posted by Wakke — 03 Jul 2014, 21:50

About buldings and intel

2014-07-03T21:34:43+02:00

From this Topic http://www.faforever.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7942&start=40#p76477.

Do you think it would be a good idea to have intel on buildings never change when they are stealthed or outside of sensor range ? Meaning a building that you scouted will remain on intel screen and targetable even once it's gone, and building that gets constructed won't appear until you get a sensor fix (that is already the case), and buildings should not disappear from intel once a stealth field comes online (I remember reading here that they did disappear in that case).

Also second question, can it be made that way ?

Statistics: Posted by Paul Kauphart — 03 Jul 2014, 21:34