Forged Alliance Forever Forged Alliance Forever Forums 2013-03-20T11:52:11+02:00 /feed.php?f=42&t=3343 2013-03-20T11:52:11+02:00 2013-03-20T11:52:11+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=3343&p=34767#p34767 <![CDATA[Re: why not give mantis tank sign?]]> but that would be annoying for the auroras...
but supcom should not have too many signs. the sign system bases on being simple

Statistics: Posted by Golol — 20 Mar 2013, 11:52


]]>
2013-03-20T11:37:53+02:00 2013-03-20T11:37:53+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=3343&p=34765#p34765 <![CDATA[Re: why not give mantis tank sign?]]>
Arguably you could say that Bricks/Loyalists and Titans/Percies suffer from the same problem, but I would say that at T1 it is vitally important to know at a glance whether you're facing a Mantis or a Hunter, but by T3 individual units are less important. So I vote for changing T1, but not T3.

What about T2 tank icons? I can't say I've noticed being caught out by thinking a Riptide was a Pillar for instance, bu what do others think? And would there be any practical way to differentiate their icons?

Statistics: Posted by Eukanuba — 20 Mar 2013, 11:37


]]>
2013-03-19T12:14:58+02:00 2013-03-19T12:14:58+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=3343&p=34624#p34624 <![CDATA[Re: why not give mantis tank sign?]]>

Statistics: Posted by Golol — 19 Mar 2013, 12:14


]]>
2013-03-19T10:22:42+02:00 2013-03-19T10:22:42+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=3343&p=34613#p34613 <![CDATA[Re: why not give mantis tank sign?]]> Statistics: Posted by Vault54 — 19 Mar 2013, 10:22


]]>
2013-03-19T08:23:44+02:00 2013-03-19T08:23:44+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=3343&p=34598#p34598 <![CDATA[Re: why not give mantis tank sign?]]> Also it may help to cyb enemy to recognise is it mantis or hunter

Statistics: Posted by ZLO_RD — 19 Mar 2013, 08:23


]]>
2013-03-18T19:08:18+02:00 2013-03-18T19:08:18+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=3343&p=34504#p34504 <![CDATA[Re: why not give mantis tank sign?]]> .
i just find it damn annoyif i have to zoom in to inspect the pixels to know if its light assault or mantis

Statistics: Posted by Golol — 18 Mar 2013, 19:08


]]>
2013-03-18T18:21:10+02:00 2013-03-18T18:21:10+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=3343&p=34492#p34492 <![CDATA[Re: why not give mantis tank sign?]]> they are bugs :cry:
(and nobody builds hunters)

Statistics: Posted by ColonelSheppard — 18 Mar 2013, 18:21


]]>
2013-03-18T18:05:52+02:00 2013-03-18T18:05:52+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=3343&p=34490#p34490 <![CDATA[Re: why not give mantis tank sign?]]> Statistics: Posted by Golol — 18 Mar 2013, 18:05


]]>
2013-03-18T17:58:52+02:00 2013-03-18T17:58:52+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=3343&p=34487#p34487 <![CDATA[Re: why not give mantis tank sign?]]> Statistics: Posted by Tango_X — 18 Mar 2013, 17:58


]]>
2013-03-18T17:46:09+02:00 2013-03-18T17:46:09+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=3343&p=34484#p34484 <![CDATA[why not give mantis tank sign?]]> in supcom the signs are very important and should be able to identify a unit excactly most of the time.
and since the mantis is the light/heavy tank for the cybrans it should have the same sign. its just much more easier to difference it from t1 light assault bots.
i know its a bot and bot signs have that shape in supcom... but in that case i think gameplay > ehm... supcom principles ? (^^).

Statistics: Posted by Golol — 18 Mar 2013, 17:46


]]>