Forged Alliance Forever

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2017-12-28T15:35:21+02:00

the mod is breaking the "optimal balance (revealed)" setting. The position of a player will not be displayed.

Statistics: Posted by ABSTRACT — 28 Dec 2017, 15:35

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2017-10-22T09:18:39+02:00

Fix is in this thread:
http://forums.faforever.com/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=14782

Statistics: Posted by R_Charger — 22 Oct 2017, 09:18

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2017-10-21T16:37:29+02:00

This mod seems to break the Reclaim UI, would love it when someone could update it.

Statistics: Posted by cel00 — 21 Oct 2017, 16:37

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2017-09-23T07:56:46+02:00

Hi!

Statistics: Posted by BulletMagnet — 23 Sep 2017, 07:56

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2017-10-03T15:50:33+02:00

PsychoBoB wrote:
That's intended. It's more efficienct to reclaim the wreck of a T2/T3 Mex and build a T1 Mex first.

No. It's more efficient to reclaim the wreck of a T2/T3 Mex and rebuild the T2/T3 Mex.
The upgrade costs from T2 to T3 Mex (eg) are the same as if u build a new one. So there is no efficiency when you reclaim a T3 Mex wreck and build a T1 mex instead of it, because upgrading this T1 Mex to T3 again will cost you the price of a T2 + a T3 mex, wich is more than 50% of a T3 mex when you rebuild it, and also definetly more than the additional 30% of a T3 mex wich u get back when you reclaim it instead of rebuilding it directly.

So if we are talking about how i do it. Instead of upgrading a T2 mex, i reclaim it and build a new T3 Mex to get 80% of the mass from the T2 mex back. I would do the same for mexes wich are already destroyed or at least rebuilding (after reclaiming) them, BUT at the same level or higher. It makes no sense for me to rebuild a T1 mex on a wreck of a T3 mex, because you loose 20% - 100% (it depends if u upgrade or reclaim) of the value every time, when you want to increase its level, and i really dont know why it should be intended.

And now exactly this is the problem: Your idea of building a T1 mex after i reclaimed the wreck of a T2 mex happens accidently when i try to do this with a T3 com (not keeping in mind it doesnt work for mexes at the same Tech level), causing eco inefficiency.

Anyway, it doesnt make sense to support T2/T3 Mex for engies (wich they have done now, thank you!) and not to have it for coms.

Statistics: Posted by ABSTRACT — 16 Sep 2017, 02:11

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2017-09-15T19:47:36+02:00

ABSTRACT wrote:
An upgraded com will still build T1 mexes.

That's intended. It's more efficienct to reclaim the wreck of a T2/T3 Mex and build a T1 Mex first. (You get 80% of the mass back)
If you rebuild the T2/T3 Mex directly you only get only 50% mass back.
With the behaviour of this mod you can be sure to get the more efficient variant.

Statistics: Posted by PsychoBoB — 15 Sep 2017, 19:47

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2017-09-15T16:39:55+02:00

An upgraded com will still build T1 mexes.

Statistics: Posted by ABSTRACT — 15 Sep 2017, 16:39

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2017-05-13T17:16:27+02:00

I fixed it and updated the code in the github repo. I'll add the current UID to the blacklist (will only take effect after the next game update) and upload a new version here (and on the vault).

Statistics: Posted by CookieNoob — 13 May 2017, 17:16

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2017-05-13T09:28:52+02:00

I am sorry... I never really dig into the mod development and only manage the repository...
If some body can fix it I can give him permission to the repository... https://github.com/IDragonfire/OneClickWonder/issues/5

Statistics: Posted by Dragonfire — 13 May 2017, 09:28

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2017-05-12T23:42:47+02:00

Hi Dragonfire, will you be so kind and adapt this mod to the actual patch?

Statistics: Posted by PsychoBoB — 12 May 2017, 23:42

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2015-09-26T21:18:04+02:00

I only modified the original mod. I have no idea how to fix this technical and conceptual.

E. G. I used this feature very often to build mexes from far away.

Statistics: Posted by Dragonfire — 26 Sep 2015, 21:18

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2015-09-26T20:53:13+02:00

Lionhardt wrote:
Imo there is a much bigger issue with oneClickWonder. That is, you often accidentally misslick on a mass spot when try to draw a selection box while having your com or an engine selected, if you have zoomed out a little. This always screw you over for a good few seconds, because by this you might just have deleted a build queue or a reclaim route etc.

bump

less leniency further zoomed out would help

Statistics: Posted by mirroredwang — 26 Sep 2015, 20:53

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2015-09-26T19:25:04+02:00

Added some issues to the repo

Statistics: Posted by ABSTRACT — 26 Sep 2015, 19:25

Re: OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2014-10-17T20:37:16+02:00

Imo there is a much bigger issue with oneClickWonder. That is, you often accidentally misslick on a mass spot when try to draw a selection box while having your com or an engine selected, if you have zoomed out a little. This always screw you over for a good few seconds, because by this you might just have deleted a build queue or a reclaim route etc.

Statistics: Posted by Lionhardt — 17 Oct 2014, 20:37

OneClickWonder (T2/T3 Mex Support)

2014-10-31T19:29:50+02:00

I love the original mod OneClickWonder:
http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=47419

Spoiler: show

But the mod spams into you log and you cannot build T2 and T3 mexes.
I am not a modder (only familiar with java/python).
Thanks to Washy he cleaned up the spam and added T2/T3 mexes support, if you ONLY select units from the same tier.

The code is available here:
https://github.com/IDragonfire/OneClickWonder

Bugs:
https://github.com/IDragonfire/OneClickWonder/issues/1

####

I try to start modding, but my debugger is not working
http://www.bilder-upload.eu/show.php?fi ... 023835.jpg
http://www.bilder-upload.eu/show.php?fi ... 023507.jpg

Statistics: Posted by Dragonfire — 15 Oct 2014, 12:25