ZLO_RD wrote:
2) you make frigates cause they are strong against destroyers and they dodge UEF/Aeon/Cybran destro shots well, but sera destroyers do not miss, they can shoot backwards, and they can submerge, so they are basicly greatest counter to any frigates.
Actually frigs are also quite useful against sera destro.
Submerged sera destros are pretty shit and only wins versus UEF. But even that its only true as long as UEF doesnt have cooper. Then its a matter of overlapping the shields properly to protect the coopers.
A decent sera player would submerge destros against a uef fleet go below shields and try to emmerge the destors to kill the cooper and the shields. At that point the frigs are quite useful to kill the sera destros, especially when the sera navy will be microed. Destros will lose their target focus.
The actual problem is that it costs more as uef to compete with sera at t2 on an *attacking* move.
On a defensive position uef is good enough. Sera will have a hard time breaking a shielded (talking about a few there shield boats, o need for a legion) navy joined with a few coopers, along a shore. T2 torp launchers just murder sera destro, remember this and they cost half in mass;). Add to that that t1 torp launcher is fucking OP against sera destro (most of the time the beams cant hit the launcher).
Turtling as UEF against sera navy is quite easy, as long as the players are even. Turtling against cybran or aeon is quite a different story. They can kill ur shit out of ur range (destros and t2 torps dont have enough range), and t1-2 uef navy cant compete with cyb or aeon for same investment, not even close.
i don't think suggesting torps against frigs is a good move. 2k hp per frigate is a lot to kill for torp bombers.
Investment wise u're in a better position with frigs+ints than t2 torps + ints. If u need torps against frigs, you are too late and should have started hover tanks. Especially as sera, avoid torps at all cost if possible. They are absolute garbage.Statistics: Posted by -_V_- — 01 Jan 2015, 17:33
]]>