Forged Alliance Forever Forged Alliance Forever Forums 2014-03-08T10:40:25+02:00 /feed.php?f=40&t=6658 2014-03-08T10:40:25+02:00 2014-03-08T10:40:25+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=6658&p=68286#p68286 <![CDATA[Re: t2 cybran navy]]> sorry i cant post it right now you might wanna look for it yourself

Statistics: Posted by ColonelSheppard — 08 Mar 2014, 10:40


]]>
2014-03-08T10:14:42+02:00 2014-03-08T10:14:42+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=6658&p=68283#p68283 <![CDATA[Re: t2 cybran navy]]>
The only problem is when the other side reaches T3 cybran are screwed if that happens especially with T3 seraphim so you've got to shit down their naval game fast

Statistics: Posted by Deafening Milk — 08 Mar 2014, 10:14


]]>
2014-03-07T23:45:20+02:00 2014-03-07T23:45:20+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=6658&p=68267#p68267 <![CDATA[Re: t2 cybran navy]]>
so i got 3 t2 sub , 2sirens and 3 t1 sub vs 2 salem and 4 frigate.

The result I GOT FUCKING RAPE!!! I barely scratch the paint of the salem with my sub....

So, dont do this. Put salem early when you reach t2 navy.

Statistics: Posted by Circuit — 07 Mar 2014, 23:45


]]>
2014-02-20T20:11:05+02:00 2014-02-20T20:11:05+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=6658&p=66252#p66252 <![CDATA[Re: t2 cybran navy]]>
Vee wrote:
WTF? Salems are way more effective vs subs/submerged destroyers than barracudas are.


Yes, Salems have much more HP, you can see that on this Lu_Xun_17 vs Zock Replay:
object

Statistics: Posted by Gerfand — 20 Feb 2014, 20:11


]]>
2014-02-20T18:37:36+02:00 2014-02-20T18:37:36+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=6658&p=66240#p66240 <![CDATA[Re: t2 cybran navy]]> Statistics: Posted by ax0lotl — 20 Feb 2014, 18:37


]]>
2014-02-19T12:53:07+02:00 2014-02-19T12:53:07+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=6658&p=65985#p65985 <![CDATA[Re: t2 cybran navy]]>

Salems will lose to full Subspam/submerged destroyer spam this is what barracudas are good for.


WTF? Salems are way more effective vs subs/submerged destroyers than barracudas are.

Statistics: Posted by Vee — 19 Feb 2014, 12:53


]]>
2014-02-19T05:18:39+02:00 2014-02-19T05:18:39+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=6658&p=65925#p65925 <![CDATA[Re: t2 cybran navy]]>
ColonelSheppard wrote:
Salems will lose to full Subspam/submerged destroyer spam this is what barracudas are good for.


Although the Salem and stealth boat torp defence make me orgasm sometimes....

Statistics: Posted by Nombringer — 19 Feb 2014, 05:18


]]>
2014-02-17T14:06:03+02:00 2014-02-17T14:06:03+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=6658&p=65660#p65660 <![CDATA[Re: t2 cybran navy]]> Statistics: Posted by ColonelSheppard — 17 Feb 2014, 14:06


]]>
2014-02-17T14:02:05+02:00 2014-02-17T14:02:05+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=6658&p=65659#p65659 <![CDATA[Re: t2 cybran navy]]> Statistics: Posted by Apofenas — 17 Feb 2014, 14:02


]]>
2014-02-17T12:27:41+02:00 2014-02-17T12:27:41+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=6658&p=65645#p65645 <![CDATA[Re: t2 cybran navy]]> Statistics: Posted by Vee — 17 Feb 2014, 12:27


]]>
2014-02-14T08:09:51+02:00 2014-02-14T08:09:51+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=6658&p=65217#p65217 <![CDATA[t2 cybran navy]]>
I wonder if a mixed of siren and baracuda (without salem) have enough fire power to break into other fleet. The siren has a great aa and can switch to attack ground with a great dps and reach for a cheaper mass and cheaper build time but low hp. The baracuda can get fast and for less mass. But I got some con: torpedos def less effectif and less hp in the fleet

So for a sea strike should i go for a more ship mixing t2 sub and siren or i should with a more balance fleet with a salem

Statistics: Posted by Circuit — 14 Feb 2014, 08:09


]]>