Statistics: Posted by colonyan — 26 Feb 2015, 20:24
tatsu wrote:LittleInferno wrote:Arent you the one that when I say something bad on the PA forums about your terrible game that PA is,you tell me to go back to the crap FAF?
yeee-NO.
want links ? have some links :
Statistics: Posted by Vashon — 26 Dec 2014, 03:09
ColonelSheppard wrote:
.youtube /watch?v=Eq9kBbk46XQ&list=UUY75Oc9isHEPZZHTwWvrKEw
I had to lol at this...
Statistics: Posted by Tremarl — 23 Dec 2014, 08:33
Statistics: Posted by Zoram — 03 Dec 2014, 23:29
Statistics: Posted by belatedcube — 03 Dec 2014, 01:10
Statistics: Posted by ColonelSheppard — 02 Dec 2014, 12:27
Statistics: Posted by Stuart98 — 14 Oct 2014, 03:25
Statistics: Posted by Shekelstein — 13 Oct 2014, 23:06
Statistics: Posted by Stuart98 — 07 Oct 2014, 23:24
Statistics: Posted by Stuart98 — 07 Oct 2014, 05:13
Statistics: Posted by Gerfand — 29 Aug 2014, 17:50
Statistics: Posted by ColonelSheppard — 23 Jul 2014, 18:25
odin002 wrote:I don't understand, why only one faction? Are they really serious about that ? I mean I've never seen a rts with only one faction.
I don't need to dig more on this game, it's dead if there is only one faction. You know what is the worst in rts game? Playing a mirror game (which means you have a faction/civilisation and the ennemy has the same), it's so boring. And when I see that on PA, the choice is easy sadly. I expected supcom2 to be the successor of fa, nope. Then I expected PA to be the successor of fa, nope. I guess there will be no successor of fa =( It's rather funny because I think it's the best rts, but no successor.
Statistics: Posted by Gerfand — 19 Jul 2014, 04:21
Statistics: Posted by AdmiralZeech — 17 Jul 2014, 14:39