At the end of the interview, Nigel says when a match starts and he is ahead he loses, but when he is behind in a match he wins. This is so typical in a SupCom game, it is worth to play it to the end.

I LOL'd at Kasparov's end interview, basically saying I know how I lost, and explains it to Nigel. Maybe something is lost in his translation, but it sounded like, "Yeah, I could had beaten him, but I already won anyway, so, whatever."