Forged Alliance Forever

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2012-03-01T01:00:54+02:00

It was already on the list :
https://bitbucket.org/thepilot/forged-a ... ntegration

Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 01 Mar 2012, 01:00

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2012-03-01T00:47:20+02:00

Yeah, I would expect that it's a little low on your list of priorities, but it would still be cool.

Statistics: Posted by Doompants — 01 Mar 2012, 00:47

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2012-02-29T23:25:42+02:00

Of course. Most of the problem is having the time to implement LEM

Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 29 Feb 2012, 23:25

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2012-02-29T22:45:13+02:00

I have played for years with a static group of 6 guys on Monday nights, and for friend games where you know who is really good, and who has a little trouble, the handicap mod was great.

I get that it must mess with Truescore though.. would it make more sense to include a handicap option in Powerlobby, and have.it exempt you from score changes any time the handicap is enabled? anytime I want to include a handicap for friends I'm not going to be interested in score anyway.

Statistics: Posted by Doompants — 29 Feb 2012, 22:45

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2012-02-28T10:01:49+02:00

Handicap mod needs LEM, so yeah for now, that will mist likely go, too.

I like Handicap a lot for friendly games among noobs and non-noobs, though. I shall always voice my wish to see it or something like it in FAF's powerlobby variant.

It does interfere strongly with the accuracy of TrueSkill, however.

Statistics: Posted by thygrrr — 28 Feb 2012, 10:01

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2012-02-27T21:46:39+02:00

thygrrr wrote:
What are the filenames (they are all *.scds, right?) for:
Sorian AI
Sorian LEM
Unit Cap Mod
...other incompatible ones?

I think I figured out a safe way to blacklist them without modifying people's FA installs (meaning people won't have to uninstall anything).

FAF will just work. It's gonna be magical!

oooooOOOOOOOOOooooh! That *will* be magical.

also, if you plan on putting the LEM in, is that going to include the handicap mod?

Statistics: Posted by Doompants — 27 Feb 2012, 21:46

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2012-02-27T13:44:12+02:00

What are the filenames (they are all *.scds, right?) for:

Sorian AI
Sorian LEM
Unit Cap Mod
...other incompatible ones?

I think I figured out a safe way to blacklist them without modifying people's FA installs (meaning people won't have to uninstall anything).

FAF will just work. It's gonna be magical!

Statistics: Posted by thygrrr — 27 Feb 2012, 13:44

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2012-02-22T15:11:51+02:00

LEM will be integrated. I've to add it in my "We want YOU" thread

Others mods requiring .scd should be turned into featured mods.

Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 22 Feb 2012, 15:11

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2012-02-22T15:05:05+02:00

thygrrr wrote:
I need the filenames for mods that don't work.

Today, a friend couldn't launch FA because he had LEM installed. He got nothing but a black screen.

Really, all .scd mods should be done away with and banished >_<

Statistics: Posted by FunkOff — 22 Feb 2012, 15:05

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2012-02-19T03:50:37+02:00

I need the filenames for mods that don't work.

Today, a friend couldn't launch FA because he had LEM installed. He got nothing but a black screen.

Statistics: Posted by thygrrr — 19 Feb 2012, 03:50

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2012-02-01T21:31:33+02:00

Ze_PilOt wrote:
Units Cap
Problem : FA-FAF lobby is proposing more options for units cap (125, 375, 625 and 875). That is not supported in GPGNET, and so it can crash/hang the lobby on GPGNET if the last game you played on FAF used over 500 as units cap limit.
Solution : Rehost a game on FAF, change the unit cap to 500, and rehost on GPGNET. Or only play on FAF

You could edit your post?We found the problem now.(For a few weeks)
The game don't stop after one Team won.

-Prince

PS: uber I used 875 always on FAF

Statistics: Posted by Prince__ — 01 Feb 2012, 21:31

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2011-12-13T19:01:35+02:00

uberge3k wrote:
To be honest, I'm not sure why the smaller increments (625, 875, etc) are even needed. I've never seen them used, and always play with 1k anyway.

Exactly. I dont see how a unit cap can make game more fun. Default it to 1k as well please on the normal lobby.

Statistics: Posted by noobymcnoobcake — 13 Dec 2011, 19:01

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2011-12-11T14:38:03+02:00

To be honest, I'm not sure why the smaller increments (625, 875, etc) are even needed. I've never seen them used, and always play with 1k anyway.

Statistics: Posted by uberge3k — 11 Dec 2011, 14:38

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2011-12-11T12:27:56+02:00

The ranked unit cap was raised to 1000 in 3610.

Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 11 Dec 2011, 12:27

Re: GPGNET incompatibility list.

2011-12-11T03:33:41+02:00

I am very much in favor of a higher default unit cap (1k) than what GPGnet has to offer.

Statistics: Posted by thygrrr — 11 Dec 2011, 03:33