Forged Alliance Forever Forged Alliance Forever Forums 2016-06-15T11:37:02+02:00 /feed.php?f=26&t=12560 2016-06-15T11:37:02+02:00 2016-06-15T11:37:02+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128728#p128728 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]>
This thread is finished.

Statistics: Posted by SYSTEM_FAILURE — 15 Jun 2016, 11:37


]]>
2016-06-13T21:58:31+02:00 2016-06-13T21:58:31+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128650#p128650 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]> Statistics: Posted by Lu_Xun_17 — 13 Jun 2016, 21:58


]]>
2016-06-12T23:58:47+02:00 2016-06-12T23:58:47+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128606#p128606 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]>
SirTobi60 wrote:
keyser wrote:EcoNoob isn't suppose to be 1800 or something ? (maybe it's a different econoob)


I think he was talking about the true rating, not his overly inflated one


heh ? since when Econoob worth 500 ?

Statistics: Posted by keyser — 12 Jun 2016, 23:58


]]>
2016-06-12T20:38:20+02:00 2016-06-12T20:38:20+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128602#p128602 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]>
keyser wrote:
EcoNoob isn't suppose to be 1800 or something ? (maybe it's a different econoob)


I think he was talking about the true rating, not his overly inflated one

Statistics: Posted by CookieNoob — 12 Jun 2016, 20:38


]]>
2016-06-12T19:03:39+02:00 2016-06-12T19:03:39+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128596#p128596 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]>
Hawkei (1200) and SkySmasher99 (1100), Team "Bangers and Smash".

Statistics: Posted by Hawkei — 12 Jun 2016, 19:03


]]>
2016-06-12T16:07:25+02:00 2016-06-12T16:07:25+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128588#p128588 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]> Statistics: Posted by keyser — 12 Jun 2016, 16:07


]]>
2016-06-12T16:03:32+02:00 2016-06-12T16:03:32+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128587#p128587 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]> Ratines:
Me: 1800
EcoNoob: 500

Statistics: Posted by FunkOff — 12 Jun 2016, 16:03


]]>
2016-06-12T09:21:08+02:00 2016-06-12T09:21:08+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128572#p128572 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]>
Ratings at time of post:
everywhere116 = 962
BeastmodeGuNs = 1198

Statistics: Posted by Beastmode — 12 Jun 2016, 09:21


]]>
2016-06-11T09:16:18+02:00 2016-06-11T09:16:18+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128506#p128506 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]>
BeastmodeGuNs wrote:
Question: What if a team of two ends up with their rating close to 2300 and they signup when their rating is below 2300 and they end up winning some matches random matches prior to the tourney and the overall rating goes over 2300? Would they have to change things up like split up unless they started losing or?

And if thats the case, does that mean rating has to be below 2300 no matter what? (Taking into consideration how rating rounds out to nearest 100 in game lobby.)


the ratings willl be assessed this afternoon which i host the challonge page. If they gain rating after that point it doesnt matter. I wont punish a team setup if they gain skill/points after sign up

thanks

Statistics: Posted by SYSTEM_FAILURE — 11 Jun 2016, 09:16


]]>
2016-06-11T07:58:30+02:00 2016-06-11T07:58:30+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128502#p128502 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]>
And if thats the case, does that mean rating has to be below 2300 no matter what? (Taking into consideration how rating rounds out to nearest 100 in game lobby.)

Statistics: Posted by Beastmode — 11 Jun 2016, 07:58


]]>
2016-06-10T16:52:17+02:00 2016-06-10T16:52:17+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128472#p128472 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]>
ZLO_RD wrote:
What will be share settings?
I'd suggest no share to prevent combombs
Edit: actually not sure anymore cause snipes are pretty lame as well


thanks for bringing that up, NO share it is..

Statistics: Posted by SYSTEM_FAILURE — 10 Jun 2016, 16:52


]]>
2016-06-10T16:41:05+02:00 2016-06-10T16:41:05+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128471#p128471 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]> I'd suggest no share to prevent combombs
Edit: actually not sure anymore cause snipes are pretty lame as well

Statistics: Posted by ZLO_RD — 10 Jun 2016, 16:41


]]>
2016-06-10T14:40:53+02:00 2016-06-10T14:40:53+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128460#p128460 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]>
Blodir wrote:
Do you accept imaginary teammates (teams with only 1 player)?


Well you could have a zero rated noob, or even, if you want a challenge, have a -200 player to bring the average down. Its up to you, but 2 players must be present

thanks

Statistics: Posted by SYSTEM_FAILURE — 10 Jun 2016, 14:40


]]>
2016-06-10T00:35:34+02:00 2016-06-10T00:35:34+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128414#p128414 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]>
Blodir wrote:
Do you accept imaginary teammates (teams with only 1 player)?
Only if those imaginary team mates have played more than 100 games :D

Statistics: Posted by Hawkei — 10 Jun 2016, 00:35


]]>
2016-06-09T22:40:06+02:00 2016-06-09T22:40:06+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=12560&p=128409#p128409 <![CDATA[Re: 2v2 Tournament (total combined rating 2300)]]>
Voodoo wrote:
SYSTEM_FAILURE wrote:This weekend, i will be hosting a noob tourney ...


Why you want to play in a noob tourney blodir? Do you think a win would be honorable?

System_Failure should add a max rating for each player.

I thought it would be fun? :o

Seriously though, what's up with this sense of "honor"? I mean I get it that his primary audience is "noobs", but that does not mean its some cardinal sin to suggest a non-noob (pretty arrogant to call myself not a noob, I know, sorry) could play with an even lower rated player? If the TD doesn't like the idea, it's his tourny, he can do whatever he wants with it, end of story. But if he thinks it would be kinda fun, then why not? You don't dictate what is morally acceptable... Besides I genuinely don't see anything even remotely questionable about this.

nocaps wrote:
i know of some 200s with over 100 games, idk if that's within your range. if system was being literal with the "100 games" quota then it should be pretty easy, but most semi-regular players around 0 rank play only unranked


I'll try to hunt for one on sunday I guess :)

Statistics: Posted by Blodir — 09 Jun 2016, 22:40


]]>