Forged Alliance Forever

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-09T02:20:39+02:00

Agreed. Locked.

Statistics: Posted by Gorton — 09 Jan 2015, 02:20

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-08T20:40:16+02:00

You think it's fun?

Go somewhere else then. This thread can be closed now.

Statistics: Posted by Plasma_Wolf — 08 Jan 2015, 20:40

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-08T19:58:56+02:00

You guys are just no fun at all

Statistics: Posted by Flynn — 08 Jan 2015, 19:58

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-07T23:36:16+02:00

Hawkei wrote:
Flynn wrote:Let's just say hypothetically that the ACU nuke failed to go off, what do you think the Seraphim would do to Samatha's wounded human body? Like would the sex organs be compatible etc? What if they impregnated her with a half Seraphim baby!?

I see no need to speculate. It did go off and death would have no doubt been painless and instantaneous. No human remains would have been recovered. So I really don't understand where you are going with this line of argument.

he started the thread wanting to talk about aliens raping mutilated girls. It was nauseating from the start, he's just trying again as people didn't share his special interest.

Statistics: Posted by Zoram — 07 Jan 2015, 23:36

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-07T10:59:22+02:00

Flynn wrote:
Let's just say hypothetically that the ACU nuke failed to go off, what do you think the Seraphim would do to Samatha's wounded human body? Like would the sex organs be compatible etc? What if they impregnated her with a half Seraphim baby!?

I see no need to speculate. It did go off and death would have no doubt been painless and instantaneous. No human remains would have been recovered. So I really don't understand where you are going with this line of argument.

Statistics: Posted by Hawkei — 07 Jan 2015, 10:59

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-06T05:49:37+02:00

This thread cannot be both on topic and sensible. The majority of page one was bad and that was slightly nauseating. I'm worried we're two posts away from our own little slice of the gamergate flamewar, which we thankfully avoided on FAF as far as I'm aware. Lock it Gorton, please.

Statistics: Posted by Sir Prize — 06 Jan 2015, 05:49

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-06T02:47:28+02:00

That line of thought went way off the line.
Can we please be sensible?

Statistics: Posted by Gorton — 06 Jan 2015, 02:47

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-06T02:24:20+02:00

Flynn wrote:
Let's just say hypothetically that the ACU nuke failed to go off, what do you think the Seraphim would do to Samatha's wounded human body? Like would the sex organs be compatible etc? What if they impregnated her with a half Seraphim baby!?

I didn't realise we were on the share-your-rape-fantasy forum

Statistics: Posted by Zoram — 06 Jan 2015, 02:24

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-06T00:53:11+02:00

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9129&start=10#p90006

Statistics: Posted by Sir Prize — 06 Jan 2015, 00:53

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-05T22:18:03+02:00

Maybe this thread would be appropriate on an erotic fan fiction forum. Maybe.

Statistics: Posted by Vee — 05 Jan 2015, 22:18

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-05T21:44:49+02:00

Let's just say hypothetically that the ACU nuke failed to go off, what do you think the Seraphim would do to Samatha's wounded human body? Like would the sex organs be compatible etc? What if they impregnated her with a half Seraphim baby!?

Statistics: Posted by Flynn — 05 Jan 2015, 21:44

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-04T23:00:28+02:00

If you're that narrow minded, you should only keep yourself to the game and not comment on the story whatsoever.

Statistics: Posted by Plasma_Wolf — 04 Jan 2015, 23:00

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-04T22:32:44+02:00

Yes, and I generally disagree with them. T3 on the field, keep your ACU either behind the front lines or behind heavy fortification.

Statistics: Posted by Vashon — 04 Jan 2015, 22:32

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-03T03:41:55+02:00

Vashon wrote:
Sorry but no, shields and overcharge do not change the fact that T3 SABs murder Commanders, and keeping them on the front lines in the T3 stage is suicide. Same whenever there are lots of gunships in play, you put your Com under a shield and some SAMs/T2Flak if you don't have ASFs/Interceptors enough. Hell, without shields and a decent amount of T1 and T2 PD, keeping the Com at the frontlines at T2 is suicide.

didn't you read plasmawolf's posts?

Statistics: Posted by belatedcube — 03 Jan 2015, 03:41

Re: Do you feel sorry General Samantha Clarke?

2015-01-03T01:19:33+02:00

Sorry but no, shields and overcharge do not change the fact that T3 SABs murder Commanders, and keeping them on the front lines in the T3 stage is suicide. Same whenever there are lots of gunships in play, you put your Com under a shield and some SAMs/T2Flak if you don't have ASFs/Interceptors enough. Hell, without shields and a decent amount of T1 and T2 PD, keeping the Com at the frontlines at T2 is suicide.

I've lost count how many times I have seen excellent, outstanding players get sniped or blasted away in the early game because they were either too aggressive or maintained that aggression way too long. It's just one of those things that is unforgivable, when it is so easily rectified by bringing the Com back letting your army and engineers carry the burden. If you actually need your Com on the frontlines Overcharging away at T3 and T2 armies, you aren't in a good position and probably about to be over run without help incoming.

Statistics: Posted by Vashon — 03 Jan 2015, 01:19