Ionic wrote:
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html
See where AMD shows up on the list....lets put it this way for a few minutes I thought this was an intel only benchmark!
I own a few of the Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3, great value, rock solid with ECC ram, and no built in graphics card on this chip for less things to go wrong.
It basically IS. What the designers of these benchmarks don't tell you is that many of them are specifically optimised for intel architectures. Next time, instead of looking at an arbitrary list on the internet, go find someone who has USED both of them in this thing called 'The real world'. It's a much more accurate representation.
Also remember that that benchmark doesn't say anywhere how many passmarks = how many FA Simspeeds. The answer? There's not actually a huge difference between my old Phenom II Tricore, the i7 in my current laptop, and the 4770k. We're talking none of them slow toe below 0 until everyone in a Setons has 600+ units, and ALL of them do so as soon as an ASF battle begins.
@OP
If you want the ultimate gaming AND working solution, especially for programming and running VMs, the very best solution is an i7-4770k with a decent cooler and a nice overclock. This will be expensive.
If you want a pure gaming build which will suffer when you try to do heavy multitasking, the i5-4670 is your ideal value for money. It will give the same gaming performance as the i7 build for half the price, but your work output will suffer if you really are doing heavy multitasking. If it's only light work than it will be fine, but if you're doing the kind of work some friends of mine are doing (Multithreaded programming, running 3 or 4 VMs at once, acting as a microserver AND doing code compiling) then it's really going to slow you down.
If the work takes the higher priority, and you don't mind lesser gaming performance (But still absolutely adequate. Don't listen to the others, nobody will be able to tell the difference in-game) then get an AMD chip. The FX-8350 (Comes with a stock cooler) fits the bill. It will cost less than the i5, in FA it will slow down a little sooner, but will still be faster than mine and I'm never the first (Or the second, or third) to hit 0, and it will support your workload much better.Statistics: Posted by IceDreamer — 24 May 2014, 21:35
]]>