Forged Alliance Forever Forged Alliance Forever Forums 2014-05-16T04:38:54+02:00 /feed.php?f=2&t=7381 2014-05-16T04:38:54+02:00 2014-05-16T04:38:54+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7381&p=72998#p72998 <![CDATA[Re: More 81x81 maps?]]> Statistics: Posted by Ambervikings91 — 16 May 2014, 04:38


]]>
2014-05-12T06:04:49+02:00 2014-05-12T06:04:49+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7381&p=72716#p72716 <![CDATA[Re: More 81x81 maps?]]>
Once I see red... I don't join. Unless it's a map I really like... then I'll pm if they can turn the mods off. Especially the games with a stack of mods I avoid..

Statistics: Posted by E8400-CV — 12 May 2014, 06:04


]]>
2014-05-12T03:37:53+02:00 2014-05-12T03:37:53+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7381&p=72711#p72711 <![CDATA[Re: More 81x81 maps?]]>
For me personally, either I want a vanilla game or a modded game. Then I decide of I want a large map or another size.

In other words, I think the group of people willing/wanting to play with mods is a subsection of those willing/wanting to play large maps. Thus doing both limits your targeted players even more -slowing joiners considerably.

Not saying you should/shouldn't just saying if you want a faster filling game, I'd shy away from mods (other than lag fix stuff).
Of course if you want both that's great, just might take longer.

And of course again, playing during a peak time helps remove this 'problem' entirely.

Statistics: Posted by errorblankfield — 12 May 2014, 03:37


]]>
2014-05-12T02:32:52+02:00 2014-05-12T02:32:52+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7381&p=72710#p72710 <![CDATA[Re: More 81x81 maps?]]> Wiki

Try hosting a game with an 81K map, people do like to play them, especially if you mix in some mods.

Statistics: Posted by The Mak — 12 May 2014, 02:32


]]>
2014-05-12T02:15:13+02:00 2014-05-12T02:15:13+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7381&p=72709#p72709 <![CDATA[Re: More 81x81 maps?]]> Statistics: Posted by Ambervikings91 — 12 May 2014, 02:15


]]>
2014-05-12T01:49:08+02:00 2014-05-12T01:49:08+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7381&p=72708#p72708 <![CDATA[Re: More 81x81 maps?]]> Statistics: Posted by Lionhardt — 12 May 2014, 01:49


]]>
2014-05-12T01:25:16+02:00 2014-05-12T01:25:16+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7381&p=72707#p72707 <![CDATA[Re: More 81x81 maps?]]> Statistics: Posted by Ambervikings91 — 12 May 2014, 01:25


]]>
2014-05-12T01:12:06+02:00 2014-05-12T01:12:06+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7381&p=72705#p72705 <![CDATA[Re: More 81x81 maps?]]> Statistics: Posted by Lionhardt — 12 May 2014, 01:12


]]>
2014-05-12T00:32:55+02:00 2014-05-12T00:32:55+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7381&p=72702#p72702 <![CDATA[Re: More 81x81 maps?]]> Statistics: Posted by Ambervikings91 — 12 May 2014, 00:32


]]>
2014-05-12T00:28:32+02:00 2014-05-12T00:28:32+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7381&p=72701#p72701 <![CDATA[Re: More 81x81 maps?]]> Statistics: Posted by rockoe10 — 12 May 2014, 00:28


]]>
2014-05-11T23:30:12+02:00 2014-05-11T23:30:12+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=7381&p=72698#p72698 <![CDATA[More 81x81 maps?]]> Statistics: Posted by Ambervikings91 — 11 May 2014, 23:30


]]>