Forged Alliance Forever

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-19T15:18:07+02:00

Gorton wrote:
Not really. There are usually less than 300 people playing PA at any time : constrast that with faf (lowest 250~, peak 1000) and steam fa (varying between 100-800) and you see how little people are actually playing PA.

Well faf numbers do seem higher, faf counts everybody who left FaF open, so all AFKers are also counted. FaF should have a ingame player count and you'll be shocked how much less people play. For example if on saturday 1000 people are on IRC maybe only 450 are playing.. And also people who bought PA via uber's website dont get counted on steam, 9 player games in PA fill in about 2 min..

Statistics: Posted by D4E_Omit — 19 May 2014, 15:18

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-19T14:16:15+02:00

I hear you I played pa and had to upgrade my system form 32 bit to 64 bit. PA is a good game but needs a lot of work at the state it is in now. But Im having a lot of fun learning this game.

Statistics: Posted by Wildman — 19 May 2014, 14:16

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-19T01:09:42+02:00

no bugs anymore

if you don't consider the 32 Bits support... my PA don't start the game... ¬¬

Statistics: Posted by Gerfand — 19 May 2014, 01:09

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-19T00:30:46+02:00

The game's numbers have gone steadily down as the game progressed further toward "Completion". It's also afaik not filled with bugs anymore, only balance issues (:P)

Statistics: Posted by Gorton — 19 May 2014, 00:30

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-19T00:04:04+02:00

Gorton wrote:
Not really. There are usually less than 300 people playing PA at any time : constrast that with faf (lowest 250~, peak 1000) and steam fa (varying between 100-800) and you see how little people actually playing PA.

well, you need to consider some things that it is not a finished game... this mean that the game have a lot of bug...

and if you consider a game like SC2 you will feel like there no one playing FA...

TA-based games are very dificult to learn, especially if you are a lazy people... so the main gaming comunity* is on FAF, and don't want to leave to play PA , or at least play both games

*based on TA

P.S. Some changes are not so bad...

Statistics: Posted by Gerfand — 19 May 2014, 00:04

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-18T23:00:34+02:00

Not really. There are usually less than 300 people playing PA at any time : constrast that with faf (lowest 250~, peak 1000) and steam fa (varying between 100-800) and you see how little people are actually playing PA.

Statistics: Posted by Gorton — 18 May 2014, 23:00

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-18T22:28:15+02:00

bikosaloie wrote:
i thought there was no chance of a star wars battlefront three but that happenes

Nobody even considered that Star Wars episode 7 could ever be a possibility, and now look at it.

The problem is, a lot of the SupCom audience moved over to PA. I don't think we'll ever see, or really need, a sequel. For real, what could a SupCom 3 offer that would be a vast enough improvement upon FAF to warrant making a whole new game?

Statistics: Posted by TheNinjas — 18 May 2014, 22:28

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-18T21:17:47+02:00

i thought there was no chance of a star wars battlefront three but that happenes

Statistics: Posted by bikosaloie — 18 May 2014, 21:17

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-08T23:51:16+02:00

Ze_PilOt wrote:
GPG is now Wargaming, the license is owned by Square Enix, the chances that it's happening are below 0.

You forgot that everybody who DID work on Supcom/FA (with the exception of like 2 people) were fired from GPG or left (many went to form Uber). The team that made Supcom does not exist and will never again exist. The chances are like negative 200 percent.... it won't happen TWICE

Statistics: Posted by FunkOff — 08 May 2014, 23:51

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-08T23:44:36+02:00

Julo wrote:
Yeah,just about the same probability of BATTLEZONE 3 ever happening

Gosh imagine you could enter every unit's cockpit in FAF and fight in 1st person... I would chase that ASF spam with a nuke for sure muhahahha

probably not a BattleZone 3, but a spiritual sucessor, like SupCom was to TA...

Statistics: Posted by Gerfand — 08 May 2014, 23:44

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-04T14:23:52+02:00

Simply making a sequel doesn't mean it will be good.

I don't give a f*** who makes the game or even what type of a game it is, as long as I enjoy it.

Statistics: Posted by Blodir — 04 May 2014, 14:23

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-04T14:19:35+02:00

I always find it very interesting how attached people are to brands & series. Comments like, "It's a good game, but it shouldnt be called [game series] 2." etc.

Personally, I don't trust Chris Taylor / GPG to do another SupCom / TA game, even if they wanted to. They've shown over and over that the things that are important to them, are not the same as the things that are important to me.

Instead, I want a new team of people, in a different company, inspired by TA/SupCom, to make an awesome TA/SupCom-style RTS, but with a good competitive focus, polished UI (like, keyrebinding?!?!), regular systematic balancing, open mod tools, etc.

I'd be much more excited for something like that, than SupCom 3 / TA 2 / PA. I dont care about the lore or the brand, I just want a better game.

eg. Path of Exile vs. Diablo 3.

Statistics: Posted by AdmiralZeech — 04 May 2014, 14:19

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-03T14:34:17+02:00

Pretty sure I would sign away my soul for a battlezone 3

Statistics: Posted by Deering — 03 May 2014, 14:34

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-03T14:21:07+02:00

Yeah,just about the same probability of BATTLEZONE 3 ever happening

Gosh imagine you could enter every unit's cockpit in FAF and fight in 1st person... I would chase that ASF spam with a nuke for sure muhahahha

Statistics: Posted by Julo — 03 May 2014, 14:21

Re: supcom 3 petition

2014-05-03T09:41:46+02:00

GPG is now Wargaming, the license is owned by Square Enix, the chances that it's happening are below 0.

Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 03 May 2014, 09:41