Forged Alliance Forever

Re: sACUs and RAS upgrade

2013-07-09T15:48:18+02:00

The three produce IDENTICAL resources both before and after RAS upgrades, but Aeon's RAS costs 500 Mass more. The only reason I could come up with is because the sACU itself costs less Mass for the Aeon, but that's silly because that is offset by the fact the unit costs more Energy.

Statistics: Posted by IceDreamer — 09 Jul 2013, 15:48

Re: sACUs and RAS upgrade

2013-07-09T15:31:31+02:00

Did you guys check if it produces more energy? If not, it's a small mistake, it'll be corrected.

Statistics: Posted by pip — 09 Jul 2013, 15:31

Re: sACUs and RAS upgrade

2013-07-09T15:01:26+02:00

Mycen wrote:
You're right, I just checked in game, and the Aeon SCU doesn't seem to generate an additional point of mass anymore. When did that happen? And why doesn't the unit database reflect that?

Thank you Mycen.

I'll just reiterate - All three sACUs generate identical resources post-RAS, but the Aeon's costs 500 Mass more.

Statistics: Posted by IceDreamer — 09 Jul 2013, 15:01

Re: sACUs and RAS upgrade

2013-07-09T05:21:28+02:00

You're right, I just checked in game, and the Aeon SCU doesn't seem to generate an additional point of mass anymore. When did that happen? And why doesn't the unit database reflect that?

Statistics: Posted by Mycen — 09 Jul 2013, 05:21

Re: sACUs and RAS upgrade

2013-07-09T04:27:41+02:00

It is not better, the increased resources come from the standard sacu values which are better for Aeon.

Statistics: Posted by SC-Account — 09 Jul 2013, 04:27

Re: sACUs and RAS upgrade

2013-07-09T03:58:44+02:00

It is better than the other RAS upgrades, why should it not cost more?

Statistics: Posted by Mycen — 09 Jul 2013, 03:58

Re: sACUs and RAS upgrade

2013-07-09T02:16:52+02:00

Statistics: Posted by BrickedKeyboard — 09 Jul 2013, 02:16

sACUs and RAS upgrade

2013-07-09T02:06:38+02:00

A player brought to my attention that the Aeon's RAS upgrade costs 500 Mass more than the UEF and Cybran ones, and I can see no logical reason for this. The 4500 Mass cost in the database is wrong, not corresponding with the ingame value. Is there a reason for this, or can it be quick-footed into 3626?

Statistics: Posted by IceDreamer — 09 Jul 2013, 02:06