Hawkei wrote:Flynn wrote:Take yesterday for instance, I was playing on Fin's Revenge, I had won the land spam war and then my opponent stood in his base and built T1 PDs all around him and managed to get quite an effective turtle going on, later upgrading his com with the T2 engineering suite to turtle with T2 PDs + shields (and then later with Ravangers + heavy shields).
There are many situations when people might feel entitled to rage. But this isn't one of them. So you'd soundly beat him on the field. Are you going to rage just cause he doesn't bend over and let you take him up the arse? Most players like to prolong the end with a valiant defence. It gives a certain kind of satisfaction. Mounting a good defence makes them feel better about loosing.
It actually reminds me of a particular match during New Years Eve. The other player had taken out most of my navy and air force. Then after nuking my base twice he says he has to go. He didn't want to miss the new years eve celebration. Then he somewhat rudely asked if I could give up. I asked why he didn't quit himself considering that he needed to go. To which he said that I should quit, because, he was quite obviously winning... You can guess my response.
I think some people need to understand that winning a game not an entitlement to victory. There is no obligation for the other player to fall on their sword for you. The object of the game is to kill the ACU, and if you haven't done that, you haven't won.
