Forged Alliance Forever

Re: Ryzen

2019-07-18T15:26:57+02:00

Yes there are other benchmarks but the one in question is the one used by FAF. The fact that my i5 2300 had 232 score and my ryzen now have 196 is kinda strange where the current chip outputs better sim speed than intel cpus that scored around 170 points in the faf benchmark.

Statistics: Posted by Endranii — 18 Jul 2019, 15:26

Re: Ryzen

2019-07-18T10:28:19+02:00

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html

Statistics: Posted by ZOB — 18 Jul 2019, 10:28

Re: Ryzen

2019-07-18T09:47:08+02:00

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16272 old thread that went into attempt to benchmark things

i would also like to have some easy to use FA benchmark, i occasionaly have time-limited access to some nice hardware.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW-xw_rTWRI i5 8250u is nice!
also had laptop with i7 8750h or something along those lines... not 100% sure, cause i don't remember it being 6 core... but anyway at 3.1-3.3 ghz it was almost same as my xeon e5 1650 running at 4.2 ghz.

all i know right now that there are plenty of Ryzen users and they are not complaining... but also i met people with 775 celerons, Phenom II X6, Athlon II X2, 1rst get core i laptorps ect ect...

Statistics: Posted by ZLO_RD — 18 Jul 2019, 09:47

Re: Ryzen

2019-07-18T02:31:09+02:00

Would be great if we could accumulate these benchmark results into a table for various CPUs. I have a hard time finding anything in that other thread.

Statistics: Posted by Katharsas — 18 Jul 2019, 02:31

Re: Ryzen

2019-07-18T00:22:08+02:00

CPU score.

Statistics: Posted by Endranii — 18 Jul 2019, 00:22

Re: Ryzen

2019-07-18T00:21:08+02:00

Ok here are the numbers I got after running the benchmark 3 times in row. The most important CPU settings are on one of the SS. As for the in lobby cpu score it is 196 as seen on attached screen shot in the other post.

Statistics: Posted by Endranii — 18 Jul 2019, 00:21

Re: Ryzen

2019-07-17T20:26:55+02:00

Katharsas wrote:
Endranii wrote:I would expect them to do just fine considering Zen and Zen+ are doing great with FAF apart from CPU score not calculating properly. Source: owner of r5 2600 on x470.

Did you or other poeple actually test how high simspeed can be with Ryzen compared to other CPUs? Or are you just assuming CPU score is lower than it should be?

Edit:Nevermind I see that IceDreamer have made "proper" benchmark that we can actually use now that I somehow missed last time. As for why said that the cpu score is not representative is cuz' during seton games I for what ever the reason had higher simspeed than people using intel CPU's even though the my CPU score was worse than theirs. As represented on this old SS.

Benchmark for those who actually want to try it: /viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16272&start=50#p164863

Statistics: Posted by Endranii — 17 Jul 2019, 20:26

Re: Ryzen

2019-07-17T18:40:28+02:00

Maybe Ryzen doesnt demolist Intel so hard when it needs the same time to complete the test...

Statistics: Posted by speed2 — 17 Jul 2019, 18:40

Re: Ryzen

2019-07-17T18:10:49+02:00

Endranii wrote:
I would expect them to do just fine considering Zen and Zen+ are doing great with FAF apart from CPU score not calculating properly. Source: owner of r5 2600 on x470.

Did you or other poeple actually test how high simspeed can be with Ryzen compared to other CPUs? Or are you just assuming CPU score is lower than it should be?

Statistics: Posted by Katharsas — 17 Jul 2019, 18:10

Re: Ryzen

2019-07-17T14:26:39+02:00

Gorton wrote:
This is because Ryzen CPUs automatically pace themselves on default settings etc.
If you force it to run at high % when you are doing the test, you will get a much more accurate cpu score. It's pretty much just idling in lobby though, so you can see why it gets a *bad* score.

No, what I'm talkin about is the discrepancy between the score of 190 points for Ryzen and 190 points for intel cpus where the Ryzen just demolishes intel one even though they apparently should be on the same level.

Statistics: Posted by Endranii — 17 Jul 2019, 14:26

Re: Ryzen

2019-07-17T04:51:34+02:00

Endranii wrote:
I would expect them to do just fine considering Zen and Zen+ are doing great with FAF apart from CPU score not calculating properly. Source: owner of r5 2600 on x470.

This is because Ryzen CPUs automatically pace themselves on default settings etc.
If you force it to run at high % when you are doing the test, you will get a much more accurate cpu score. It's pretty much just idling in lobby though, so you can see why it gets a *bad* score.

Statistics: Posted by Gorton — 17 Jul 2019, 04:51

Re: Ryzen

2019-07-17T04:17:28+02:00

I would expect them to do just fine considering Zen and Zen+ are doing great with FAF apart from CPU score not calculating properly. Source: owner of r5 2600 on x470.

Statistics: Posted by Endranii — 17 Jul 2019, 04:17

Re: Ryzen

2019-07-17T00:17:25+02:00

Not yet. It will finally replace my i7-3770 with prooobably a 3700X or 3900X (as a developer I benefit more from cores than raw GHz). But I am waiting for final clarification on the matter whether the X470 or B470 boards will support PCIE4.0 or not. Because the new X570 boards are heavily overpriced.

Statistics: Posted by Brutus5000 — 17 Jul 2019, 00:17

Ryzen

2019-07-17T00:06:07+02:00

Has anyone taken FAF for a spin on one of the new Ryzen cpus?

Statistics: Posted by Flipper — 17 Jul 2019, 00:06