Where soon™ is often equivalent to notgonnahappen™ *cough* GW *cough*? Would anyone have something more definite; I mean -in full seriousness- is there anyone working on that, or even planning to work on that? Because, without even any rough estimate -six months on the wrong end of the deadline-, this sounds awfully like we-all-know-this-wont-actually-ever-happen-we-just-cant-say-that-out-loud.
And if anyone could clarify what this deadline and stuff is actually about? I mean the public notice couldn't have been any more muddy than it was. Firstly, I thought visionik had hung up the mantle some time back? An then, "not share any copyright protected code"? Hello, that's inherently impossible in this legal system; unless it was put into the Public Domain, it all is copyright-protected. The only question is who owns the rights.)
incoherent rambling
And then not actually working on solving the sourcecode thing is just a good cover on top.
will there be some community left at the end of it
Statistics: Posted by PhilipJFry — 16 Jun 2019, 22:46
PhilipJFry wrote:
regarding your actual question - when someone finds time to implement the new updater so we don't share any more copyright protected code
no clue when that is going to happen since faf is a community driven thing my best estimate is soon™
PhilipJFry wrote:
regarding your other verification idea - not going to happen [...]
some picture that we have to verify manually is not an option especially since allowing that would also mean that we would effectively allow each user (with a physical copy) to create as many verified accounts as he likes
Statistics: Posted by finfin — 16 Jun 2019, 21:43
Statistics: Posted by PhilipJFry — 16 Jun 2019, 07:11
Statistics: Posted by finfin — 16 Jun 2019, 04:33