Forged Alliance Forever

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T09:35:56+02:00

GL with your mod, but this thread leads nowhere

Statistics: Posted by speed2 — 23 Jun 2017, 09:35

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T09:35:30+02:00

Can I have a new irony meter, please?

Statistics: Posted by RocketRooster — 23 Jun 2017, 09:35

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T09:34:02+02:00

people write down stuff on the wiki and create videos for the sole reason of concentrating information instead of having to explain stuff over and over and over and over and over.........
if you dislike what is being conveyed in the videos address them directly or at least bring some decent arguments aside from "i don't like your links"

Statistics: Posted by PhilipJFry — 23 Jun 2017, 09:34

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T09:33:48+02:00

Quite.

Statistics: Posted by RocketRooster — 23 Jun 2017, 09:33

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T09:31:28+02:00

It's like trying to explain the heliocentric system to a medieval peasant.

Statistics: Posted by FtXCommando — 23 Jun 2017, 09:31

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T09:20:36+02:00

Heh... so many shiny big red buttons so easily pushable around these parts.

1) You clearly can't offer any me any arguments except link spam
2) You clearly don't know what right wing authoritarianism means
3) You have this thing about needing to have your opinion be "valid", and expect me to have the same need. Wrong.
4) You have this thing for aggression. It's wasted on me, as the adaptation of the koan was on you (and, sadly and unexpectedly, Phillip as well).
6) My irony meter asplode.
7) High five buddy.

I'm still waiting for an argument from you that doesn't involve mere assertion or link spam, or getting personal.

Statistics: Posted by RocketRooster — 23 Jun 2017, 09:20

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T09:11:50+02:00

Typical response from the player not so recently crying about people not being courteous to him.

The toaster probably plays better then you, anyways.

Statistics: Posted by biass — 23 Jun 2017, 09:11

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T08:59:59+02:00

Erm....

Statistics: Posted by RocketRooster — 23 Jun 2017, 08:59

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T08:58:28+02:00

Not everyone who has an opinion that differs from yours is in a cult.
If you want to be taken serious you should at least try to argue instead of dismissing the points that other people make.
Also ftxcommando has a point: if you want to see how a game without factions plays you can just play a different game where no such thing as different factions exists or just play custom 1v1 games with both players having the same faction.

Statistics: Posted by PhilipJFry — 23 Jun 2017, 08:58

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T08:39:48+02:00

biass wrote:
RocketRooster wrote:And if you think that Cybran playstyle is different to that of UEF, well, it's an illusion.

im not granting this a legit response, if you're incapable of seeing what works and what doesn't with each faction maybe you're just bad at the game, truth hurts

i suggest you have a look through maybe some wiki tutorials here: http://wiki.faforever.com/index.php?tit ... ing_SupCom
(i wrote some of these guides!)

Heaven also made some video tutorials relating to each factions strengths and weaknesses here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJYYaF ... vgJAqrhC2A

Keep cancerous political statements out of video game discussion if you wish to keep what you say still "valid"

A disciple of another sect once came to RocketRooster as he was eating his morning meal.

“I would like to give you this list of youtube links”, said the outsider, “because I want you to be happy.”

RocketRooster took the paper that was offered him and put it into the toaster, saying: “I wish the toaster to be happy, too.”

Statistics: Posted by RocketRooster — 23 Jun 2017, 08:39

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T07:59:33+02:00

RocketRooster wrote:
And if you think that Cybran playstyle is different to that of UEF, well, it's an illusion.

No, 900 Cybran playstyle is no different than 900 UEF playstyle. Totally different thing than Cybran and UEF playstyle, which are in fact very different.

Why don't you go around and ask people what their least favorite type of match is. You will get two answers: people that don't like aeon and people that don't like mirror matches. The former tends to be people that haven't figured out how to beat auroras yet while also fluctuating depending on the percentage of 5x5s each person played on ladder. The latter comes from the fact that the gameplay just gets boring.

Also I'd argue that a "battlefield expert" is truly tested at those moments when they don't have the tools to answer a problem. Where they actually need to innovate and create a solution using only what they have rather than robotically finding an automatic counter.

Statistics: Posted by FtXCommando — 23 Jun 2017, 07:59

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T07:22:13+02:00

RocketRooster wrote:
And if you think that Cybran playstyle is different to that of UEF, well, it's an illusion.

im not granting this a legit response, if you're incapable of seeing what works and what doesn't with each faction maybe you're just bad at the game, truth hurts

i suggest you have a look through maybe some wiki tutorials here: http://wiki.faforever.com/index.php?tit ... ing_SupCom
(i wrote some of these guides!)

Heaven also made some video tutorials relating to each factions strengths and weaknesses here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJYYaF ... vgJAqrhC2A

Keep cancerous political statements out of video game discussion if you wish to keep what you say still "valid"

Statistics: Posted by biass — 23 Jun 2017, 07:22

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T07:11:57+02:00

Perhaps you could explain what it brings instead of making an argument via assertion?

I will make it clear right now that I fully grasp the difference between fluff diversity and playstyle diversity. They're not the same thing. And if you think that Cybran playstyle is different to that of UEF, well, it's an illusion. The playstyle is the same for all factions, it merely leans this way or that in terms of offense and defence and whatnot because "diversity". There's no diversity here except in terms of fluff. If you took away the fluff and factional backstories, the groupings would seem entirely arbitrary.

Perhaps it's my lack of right-wing authoritarian tendencies that makes me prefer having the freedom to do whatever I like given a gamut of choices.

Statistics: Posted by RocketRooster — 23 Jun 2017, 07:11

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T06:59:13+02:00

pa is Planetary Annihilation, a successor title
Introduces a bunch of neato mechanics but only one "faction" just recoloured and thus the game is incredibly dumbed down

if you cannot understand what having 4 factions brings to the game i suggest you check it out and then come back

Statistics: Posted by biass — 23 Jun 2017, 06:59

Re: Fakshunal dyevircitee

2017-06-23T06:56:37+02:00

Pa? What means pa?

I'm yer pa. Come to daddy.

Statistics: Posted by RocketRooster — 23 Jun 2017, 06:56