Forged Alliance Forever

Re: FAF stats

2020-06-08T19:16:17+02:00

we had some 2012 supremacy discussions recently, i've got bored and made some plots.
all stats are from the current leaderboards, so the plots don't account for smurfs, inactive players etc.

rating on the x axis, number of players on the y axis, different sub plots by years

top 5000 global rated players

top 5000 ladder rated players

Statistics: Posted by Myxir — 08 Jun 2020, 19:16

Re: FAF stats

2020-04-04T21:13:48+02:00

New stats on the new users please. out of the 2000 users peak how much are russian -100 rated astro crater players?

Statistics: Posted by Bennis- — 04 Apr 2020, 21:13

Re: FAF stats

2020-04-02T09:52:05+02:00

A lot of date columns have been added in 2016 and where populated with the date it was introduced. So yeah, old data is garbage.

Statistics: Posted by Brutus5000 — 02 Apr 2020, 09:52

Re: FAF stats

2020-04-02T09:00:50+02:00

The way the 2016 spike lasts exactly the whole year of 2016 makes me wonder if it's not a data issue rather than a genuine spike.

Statistics: Posted by RedX — 02 Apr 2020, 09:00

Re: FAF stats

2020-03-31T23:59:03+02:00

where are my new stats

something something peak users / day

Statistics: Posted by Farmsletje — 31 Mar 2020, 23:59

Re: FAF stats

2019-11-26T15:51:01+02:00

there are graphs about player's rating evolution over time, but are there graphs about player's rating deviation evolution over time?
Edit: Would that help detecting players losing on purpose? or if player is being reported as losing on purpose this rating info can maybe show that he always was playing like that or something like that...

Statistics: Posted by ZLO_RD — 26 Nov 2019, 15:51

Re: FAF stats

2019-08-27T10:10:19+02:00

The difference between the distribution on global rating and 1v1 goes to show , that there is no meaning in implementing the global rating as it is now. The only rating should be 1v1 with team games contributing only a small amount to overall rating.
Of course all this has not much meaning if the capability to play is hindered by connection issues and such. Logging into games should work more effortlessly , so players gather a significant sample of games that is possible to be evaluated objectively. It is easier to correct 1v1s , instead of big team games for obvious reasons. Ideally we would like all games to work, but we should start with the wasy tasks first.

Statistics: Posted by prodromos — 27 Aug 2019, 10:10

Re: FAF stats

2019-08-02T20:58:12+02:00

GW was 2 years dead by 2016.

Statistics: Posted by FtXCommando — 02 Aug 2019, 20:58

Re: FAF stats

2019-08-02T14:41:55+02:00

Farmsletje wrote:
any idea what caused the massive spike in 2016?

good question! I want to know too! Galactic War, maybe?

Statistics: Posted by tatsu — 02 Aug 2019, 14:41

Re: FAF stats

2019-08-01T20:16:46+02:00

Is there a way to show statistics of mods in general or only featured ones?

Statistics: Posted by Morax — 01 Aug 2019, 20:16

Re: FAF stats

2019-08-01T18:33:16+02:00

any idea what caused the massive spike in 2016?

Statistics: Posted by Farmsletje — 01 Aug 2019, 18:33

Re: FAF stats

2019-08-01T15:17:29+02:00

i've got the 1st one as an interactive file, trying to figure out how to embed it to the post

Statistics: Posted by keyser — 01 Aug 2019, 15:17

Re: FAF stats

2019-06-18T21:10:50+02:00

those mod stats bear no value as bans include smurf bans. If corrected for smurfs it would get interesting.

Statistics: Posted by Bennis- — 18 Jun 2019, 21:10

Re: FAF stats

2019-06-17T19:32:20+02:00

Completed => report has been reviewed and completed (lead to an action or not)
Discarded => Fake report discarded, e.g. no replay indicated or missing critical info, etc
handled => the last moderator to have touched this report (the reports can e in "processing"' waiting state, e.g. if we wait for someone to send the replay file, also if someone revokes the ban he will be the last moderator to have handled it, etc)

Statistics: Posted by Louvegarde — 17 Jun 2019, 19:32

Re: FAF stats

2019-06-17T19:00:37+02:00

what's the difference between "completed" and "handled" reports ? Since completed + discarded =/= handled

Statistics: Posted by keyser — 17 Jun 2019, 19:00