Forged Alliance Forever Forged Alliance Forever Forums 2012-05-05T12:31:39+02:00 /feed.php?f=2&t=1156 2012-05-05T12:31:39+02:00 2012-05-05T12:31:39+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12377#p12377 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]>

Statistics: Posted by -_V_- — 05 May 2012, 12:31


]]>
2012-05-05T11:39:40+02:00 2012-05-05T11:39:40+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12374#p12374 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]>

Statistics: Posted by Voodoo — 05 May 2012, 11:39


]]>
2012-05-05T11:34:20+02:00 2012-05-05T11:34:20+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12373#p12373 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]>
TA4Life wrote:
Even though gala is a good setons player he is no match for lu_xun, Lu xun should be taking on Dim14 or Jaguar or misterwhite

Are you drunk ? lol. I would bet on Galac anytime (Even if sometimes he can fail like in this one, but I've failed him many more times so i don't say shit haha). I would always trust him to even play versus Dim, yes Dim lol ;) . When you've seen the guy grill Dim's ass from beach without having help, well for me it's enough.

Jaguar and white are very good too, especially jaguar, but galac is better on any position (Well except mid :) ).
We were joking aobut that yesterday night with galac, the best stacked team atm would be Dim, Smasher, Galac and me.

Don't think it will happen ever, people are already pissed off and complaining all the time because I pay with Galac.
oh well at least this game will show that we lose too :roll:



eps. Some T2 bombers and voodoo was done.

As aeon I did not have the t2 bombers. I could have done mercies but I thought it was fine cause when i looked Voodoo was on the verge to die. I didn't watch the replay nor do I want to considering the shit in mid, but whatever happened, arties reached my base. Enough said. This shouldn't happen unless major f*** up in mid. I don't think all the north side put efforts into mid so that the mid could push. Voodoo made his shit on his own I bet. But now that I know whose smurf Voodoo is, well it was supposed to happen in mid. I just didn't know before the game. I would still have played it, but I would have expected the loss at least and would been more relaxed, and I would have avoided those not so cool comments (that I regret, but well in the heat of the game, especially in those again the "pros", that's my sadly famous attitude :lol: )on Disturbed gaming (and not Disturbed himself, which is a BIG diff).


I understand that classic Seton gameplay is "one spot one role", and the back spot is supposed to make air like shit, but making air is less important than winning the game.


Well considering the teams, I know from experience that if I was starting to spam shit from the beginning we had no chance already. Isen is not be the best air micro player, but he can clearly produce enough to put in danger, *which happened* btw
when I really had no choice but to produce some shit (I thought galac needed me to kill the first ships from Lu Xun), cause the thing is not so much about the mass you put in those extra things, it's the time you waste to build those shit, which can possibly fail (like the mercies). I managed to make up for the 10 ( i think) torps that I made, and still won air but then I overdid it with the 29 extra torps and the 8?10? mercies. Happens to me all the time :lol: . But as I said, something has to be tried to stop the mid.


I knew before the game started we would lose the south sea at some point and in my head I was already in the spirit of getting the upper hand in terms of asf to be able to help lion so he could get the early-mid reclaim and upgrade his eco and possibly push his navy (yes i had my own agenda before hand). I just failed to anticipate that mid would get rolled too early, and that galac wouldn't have the upper hand as he usually does.

If you (talking to zep) were used to play with me (When im back spot) you would know that I don't just stupidly spam asf (when I judge i can afford it, meaning keeping air superiority or remaining in a close result while building the other extra things. ) ;)

Sure we could have made a team plan and decide for combined efforts, but I only knew Voodoo was a good ladder player, not that he was also used to play on setons. Now that I know who he is , well... lol. It was supposed to happen.

Not sure I would have tried to think of a plan anyway since I am not really interested in stunts and team plans. Selfish but I prefer to own my side fair and square 1v1 then try to do what i can for my team to turn up the tides if necessary. But team plans work, for sure. I just fail to have any satisfaction in winning this way. I don't have the spirit of winning at all cost. People would say I give up too easily, which is true. When I lose my side on my own mistakes, I usually stop trying :?


With some land factories on front from the back spot, or even some T2/T3 gunships (tip : ASF don't kill anything else than ASF), you would have win the game.

I would never, never do that unless I know for sure I will own my counterpart for sure. Never would I do that against VIP, galac, erwin_pommel, dcc, smasher, etc. It's suicide and it's game over already.
If you had more experience in the really high grade games *there*, you would know what I mean.

Ask VIP, in the old days, how many times we were bored of playing air versus each other. Couldn't do any other shit than asf even after winning a battle. It was really too high of a risk of losing air, even after winning some battles.


And that's where the difference lie : While the seton "pro" have a more refined BOs, the other team had better ideas.

No the other team had 2 better(one a LOT better, the other one a bit better) and my rocks "supposedly rock" player failed a bit in the beginning. That's why we lost. No better plan or whatsoever.Though I was expecting a plan from north team. t2 bomber rush. massive drops, com drops hehe :mrgreen:

Statistics: Posted by -_V_- — 05 May 2012, 11:34


]]>
2012-05-05T10:12:12+02:00 2012-05-05T10:12:12+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12361#p12361 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]> Statistics: Posted by TA4Life — 05 May 2012, 10:12


]]>
2012-05-04T20:46:21+02:00 2012-05-04T20:46:21+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12328#p12328 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]>
the teams were not equal:

4 top 20 players
vs
1 top 20, 2 top 50, and one guy on rank 700something?

Statistics: Posted by laPPen — 04 May 2012, 20:46


]]>
2012-05-04T18:27:45+02:00 2012-05-04T18:27:45+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12311#p12311 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]> Statistics: Posted by TheGodFather3 — 04 May 2012, 18:27


]]>
2012-05-04T13:58:01+02:00 2012-05-04T13:58:01+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12286#p12286 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]>
I understand that classic Seton gameplay is "one spot one role", and the back spot is supposed to make air like shit, but making air is less important than winning the game.

With some land factories on front from the back spot, or even some T2/T3 gunships (tip : ASF don't kill anything else than ASF), you would have win the game.

And tha'ts where the difference lie : While the seton "pro" have a more refined BOs, the other team had better ideas.

Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 04 May 2012, 13:58


]]>
2012-05-04T13:25:58+02:00 2012-05-04T13:25:58+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12284#p12284 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]>
I'm a bit confusioned about something. I thought V = Cyth = Watashi = a girl.
But it seems he's just french. Or a french girl?

Statistics: Posted by pip — 04 May 2012, 13:25


]]>
2012-05-04T12:57:47+02:00 2012-05-04T12:57:47+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12282#p12282 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]>
TnukSmasher3000 wrote:
I want the front spot next time there's a game! : :P

Yes please.

When arties and t3 tanks are on my base killing my engies assisting my air fac, no it wasn't fine in mid :)

Statistics: Posted by -_V_- — 04 May 2012, 12:57


]]>
2012-05-04T12:28:19+02:00 2012-05-04T12:28:19+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12279#p12279 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]>
I want the front spot next time there's a game! : :P

Statistics: Posted by TnukSmasher3000 — 04 May 2012, 12:28


]]>
2012-05-04T05:34:06+02:00 2012-05-04T05:34:06+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12262#p12262 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]>
TA4Life wrote:
Voodoo is one of the best setons players with his smurf..

What's his smurf anyway?

PM me if that's a big secret

Statistics: Posted by -_V_- — 04 May 2012, 05:34


]]>
2012-05-04T05:31:25+02:00 2012-05-04T05:31:25+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12261#p12261 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]>
Ze_PilOt wrote:
Oh, you weren't THAT bad :)

Nice one :lol:


Luxy did really good taking into account that he really never plays Setons. Voodoo aswell.

Absolutely, well apparently Voodoo plays under a smurf disguisement , but Lu Xun did pretty well. Reason why I chose to make those early (too early) 10 torps, just to be sure, galac would be able to support me. I only needed him to win as he usually does and the others to hold for a moment to win this. Thought it was doable. It failed.


Would be nice to see a proper noob on noob game though, with the setons noobs having a proper mid noob. Perhaps someday we can do this, I volunteer to be the setons mid noob.

I would definately sign for it if you'd play ,or smasher, or aflac, or anyone a bit competent in mid. I would play rocks and not air if this happens so that I don't have to make up for this Galac noob :lol: (and in the same time show once again how OP the t3 navy is ;) )

Statistics: Posted by -_V_- — 04 May 2012, 05:31


]]>
2012-05-04T02:21:15+02:00 2012-05-04T02:21:15+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12257#p12257 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]>
Would be nice to see a proper noob on noob game though, with the setons noobs having a proper mid noob. Perhaps someday we can do this, I volunteer to be the setons mid noob.

Statistics: Posted by TA4Life — 04 May 2012, 02:21


]]>
2012-05-03T23:33:42+02:00 2012-05-03T23:33:42+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12250#p12250 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]>
I'm not sure how that game would've look if your midplayer did hold. Before the game i would've bet on you, but i think even in a different world with an even midfight we would've had a sligh upper hand.

Statistics: Posted by Zock — 03 May 2012, 23:33


]]>
2012-05-03T21:59:49+02:00 2012-05-03T21:59:49+02:00 /viewtopic.php?t=1156&p=12242#p12242 <![CDATA[Re: Setons noobs vs random noobs]]>
-_V_- wrote:
Too bad you guys are too scared to let us rematch it with a less clowny 4th element.


Oh, you weren't THAT bad :)

But I've learned that you win a seton by not dying first. I think I can win all my game !

Statistics: Posted by Ze_PilOt — 03 May 2012, 21:59


]]>